As Arizona’s 2024 election draws near, voters are confronted with several ballot propositions that will significantly impact public health. Some of these propositions pose serious risks, while a couple offer public health opportunities. It’s important for AZPHA members to be well-informed on each measure – not just for your own vote – but many in your friend groups and families will look to you for advice on the plusses and minuses of each the upcoming ballot measures.
AzPHA has written arguments against 5 of the upcoming ballot measures and in support of two. Here’s a thumbnail summary of each:
Oppose Proposition 133: Requiring Partisan Primaries
Our Argument: Protect Voter Choice: No On 133
The proposal to shift Arizona’s open primary system to a closed partisan primary process is problematic. It would exclude independent voters and reduce overall voter participation. When fewer voices are heard, especially those not aligned with major parties, health policies risk becoming less inclusive and representative. Public health thrives on diversity and comprehensive community engagement; limiting voter access undermines this foundation and can lead to health policies that do not reflect the needs of all Arizonans.
Oppose Proposition 134: Undermining Voter Initiatives
Our Argument: Arizona Voter Initiatives Under Siege: No On 134
Increasing the number of required signatures for voter initiatives seems like a measure to ensure seriousness, but in reality, it stifles grassroots movements. Public health advocacy often relies on the ability to mobilize quickly and effectively to address emerging issues. By raising the bar for voter initiatives, this proposition would hinder essential health campaigns and delay critical interventions that can save lives and improve community health.
Oppose Proposition 135: Undermining Arizona’s Emergency Response Authority
Our Argument: Arizona’s Emergency Response System at Risk: No On 135
The purpose of any state emergency declaration is to allow state agencies to implement reasonable measures to help quickly respond to disasters. Voting for this would add bureaucratic red tape and delay Arizona’s emergency response. The legislature wants to slow or stop the response to a declared state of emergency after only 30 days. The state legislature is already set up to micromanage executive branch public health emergency responses after only 120 days.
Without the governor having that extra temporary statutory authority during a public health emergency we’re in danger of losing the ability to quickly respond. And when people and communities are in a state of emergency, the last thing they need to do is wait for the legislature to come to a consensus.
Support Proposition 139: Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health
Our Argument: Vote for Access to Sexual & Reproductive Health: Yes On 139
Ensuring access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services is a cornerstone of public health. This proposition aims to safeguard these services, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about their bodies. Access to contraception, abortion services, and sexual health education are critical for reducing health disparities and promoting overall well-being. Supporting this measure is essential for protecting individual health rights and improving public health outcomes.
Support Proposition 140: Empowering Independent Voters with Open Primaries
Our Argument: Empower Independent Voters: Yes On 140
This measure proposes implementing open primaries, allowing all voters, regardless of party affiliation, to participate in primary elections. From a public health perspective, increasing voter participation leads to more representative and responsive governance. Policies that reflect the diverse needs of the population, including health concerns, are more likely to emerge from a system where all voices are heard. Open primaries enhance democratic engagement and contribute to more effective public health policymaking.
Oppose Proposition 314: Harming Border Health and Safety
Our Argument: Insist on Law Enforcement Accountability: No On 314
This proposition advocates for stringent enforcement measures at the border, prioritizing ‘border security’ over humanitarian concerns. Such an approach neglects the health needs of migrants and border communities, increasing health risks and suffering. Public health emphasizes equitable access to care, regardless of immigration status.
Policies that marginalize and criminalize migrants undermine public health efforts and fail to address complex health needs at the border, leading to broader community health issues. This harmful proposition also provides blanket immunity for law enforcement actions – even further eroding accountability among law enforcement.
Oppose Proposition 315: Protect Arizona’s Healthcare, Seniors & Environment
Our Argument: Protect Seniors and the Environment: No On 315
Weakening the regulatory authority of state agencies is a direct threat to public health. This proposition seeks to limit the enforcement capabilities of agencies responsible for health and safety standards. Strong regulatory oversight is crucial for preventing public health crises, ensuring clean water, safe food, and effective disease control. Diluting this authority endangers all Arizonans, eroding essential protections that keep our communities healthy and safe.