The Real H5N1 Threat: Kennedy’s Assault on Our Public Health System

Last week’s 60 Minutes segment on H5N1 focused on some shortcomings in the US agricultural sector as they grapple with H5N1 influenza infections among poultry, cattle, and some dairy workers.

The segment focused on legit gaps like poor USDA oversight, limited worker protection, and the spread of the virus through dairy herds. The veterinary experts featured in the piece rightly presented arguments about the need for better biosecurity and surveillance in the ag sector.

Bird flu poses growing risk to people as pathogen spreads, scientists warn | 60 Minutes – CBS News

But let’s be honest… H5N1 isn’t something we’re going to “contain.” It’s global. It’s in migratory birds, domestic poultry, and now cattle — not just in the U.S., but around the world. Mitigation is the only practical path forward at the farm and ranch level.

The real threat to humans is Kennedy’s rapid disassembly of our public health system. He’s intentionally unraveling our capacity to respond if (or when) H5N1 adapts for sustained human-to-human transmission and becomes more virulent.

Local and state health departments — the frontline of any pandemic response (think surveillance, antiviral distribution and vaccine delivery and administration) is being cut dramatically by Kennedy.

The U.S. has walked away from the WHO. Trust in public health institutions is at historic lows largely because of Kennedy and Trump’s behavior and decision-making.

Those who should be reinforcing evidence-based public health practice (Secretary Kennedy) are instead waging a war on science, vaccine development, and the very concept of public health.

NIH researchers who once focused on rapid vaccine development (and zoonotic spillover) are being defunded, fired and driven out. Entire teams are gone, and his plan is to cut even further into NIH’s mission next year.

If H5N1 reassorts and sparks a human pandemic, we’ll be ‘responding’ with an eviscerated system. And it won’t just be about late vaccine timelines or scarce antivirals (or public health’s ability to distribute and administer them) — it’ll be about the absence of the workforce and infrastructure to mount a response at all.

After just 4 months of this administration, we’re already in worse shape now than we were for H1N1 in 2009. What we’ve already lost and continue to lose isn’t just funding or programs, its institutional knowledge, technical capacity, and our public health and research workforce and institutions.

If things don’t change, three and a half years from now we’ll be responding to pandemics with stone knives & bearskins.

Vitalyst’s Suzanne Pfister to Retire this Summer

After more than 11 years leading Vitalyst Health Foundation, Suzanne Pfister, President and CEO, has announced her retirement this upcoming summer.

Suzanne has led Vitalyst through many successes, including the creation of its Systems Change Grants, the rebranding of the Foundation from St. Luke’s Health Initiatives to Vitalyst Health Foundation in 2017, and the adoption of the Elements of a Healthy Community.

The Vitalyst Board of Trustees has retained DSG | Koya to lead the search for our next Chief Executive Officer. DSG | Koya is a nationally recognized executive search firm with deep expertise in placing transformative leaders in mission-driven organizations. The search is being conducted by Managing Director Michelle Bonoan and her team. 

Candidates can inquire here  Vitalyst_CEO@koyapartners.com.

Vitalyst’s Suzanne Pfister Announces Retirement This Summer – Vitalyst Health

ASU Opening New School of Technology for Public Health

The School of Technology for Public Health, at ASU is launching this Fall with two new graduate degree programs – a two-year master of public health degree with a concentration in public health technology and a one-year master of science in public health technology (a brand-new gap year degree for the emerging field of public health technology).

These programs are the first-of-their-kind in the nation to weave together public health with elements of engineering, data science, design, and entrepreneurship. The program is hosting ongoing information sessions that we encourage you to attend in addition to reviewing the attached flier. You can also reach the department via email at [email protected] or by phone at 602-496-0100.

The Master of Science in Public Health Technology weaves together introductory public health knowledge with basic elements of engineering, data science, design, and entrepreneurship, with a focus on designing and deploying accessible, ethical, and equitable digital health tools and technologies.

The Master of Public Health, Public Health Technology concentration program is for students who are seeking an education that knits together biostatistics, epidemiology, environmental health and policy with elements of engineering, data science, design and entrepreneurship.

CDC Vaccine Recommendations in Limbo Amid Leadership Uncertainty

Last week the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended expanding RSV vaccinations to adults aged 50–59 with underlying health conditions and endorsed a new combination meningococcal vaccine for teens.

Normally, this ACIP recommendation would be translated into policy when (if) the CDC adopts the recommendation. Not this time. Acting CDC Director Susan Monarez has recused herself because of “legal limitations” pending her Senate confirmation… meaning the CDC Chief of Staff  – Matthew Buzzelli (a former federal prosecutor with zero medical or public health training) will decide whether to adopt the ACIP recommendations.

Health insurance coverage for vaccines typically follows CDC recommendations. Under the Affordable Care Act private insurance plans must cover new vaccine recommendations in the next plan year.

Until the CDC officially adopts ACIP’s recommendations, coverage for both these vaccines will remain as is. Buzzelli may very well not decide at all or veto the ACIP’s recommendation.

That’s A Wrap: AZPHA’s 2025 Conference

Thank you to all the attendees, speakers, sponsors, exhibitors, poster presenters and AZPHA board members who attended our 2025 conference on April 3! 

All in all we had about 250 attendees at the conference – and by all accounts, engagement was very good – with little attrition as the day progressed.

Here’s a link to the conference Speaker BiographiesSession Learning Objectives and our final Conference Brochure Below are links to many of the presentations that our speakers shared with you during the conference. 

Thanks again for attending and enjoy the rest of the Spring. 

U.S. Supreme Court Could Roll Back, Freeze or Eliminate Preventive Health Coverage – Oral Arguments Tomorrow (4/21/25)

On Monday the U.S. Supreme Court will hear Braidwood Management v. Becerra, which could roll back and freeze coverage for key preventive health services and screenings currently required by the Affordable Care Act. The new name for the case is Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc.

At issue is whether commercial health plans have to continue to cover (w/o co pays) the Category A & B preventive services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

USPSTF A & B Recommendations

Braidwood argues that USPSTF members have too much unreviewable authority; that they’re “principal officers” under the Constitution who should require Senate confirmation (task force members aren’t Senate confirmed). Because USPTF members aren’t Senate confirmed, the Plaintiffs argue that their decisions are void.

The Biden administration argued in the lower federal lower courts that USPSTF members are “inferior officers” – meaning that they’re adequately supervised by the HHS Secretary and that the recommendations are therefore valid.

The District Court ruled that all preventive-care coverage requirements that the task force has established since 2010 are invalid.

The U.S. Court of Appeals upheld that District Court decision but disagreed with invalidating all the post 2010 decisions, concluding that HHS should only be prohibited from enforcing the preventive-services coverage requirements against the Braidwood company itself, but not others. In other words that it doesn’t apply to the health care industry as a whole.

It’s unclear whether Kennedy’s Solicitor General will pull punches during oral arguments tomorrow in response to guidance he may get from Trump or because he doesn’t agree with the post 2010 TF decisions or preventive screenings etc. It’s a real risk, as some political appointees are more interested in keeping their jobs than doing them.

ACA’s Preventive Services Requirements are the Next Target for Opponents of the Affordable Care Act:
Braidwood Management v. Becerra

If the Supreme Court sides with the District Court, insurers could opt out of covering services recommended or updated by the USPSTF since 2010, including screenings for colorectal cancer in adults aged 45–49, depression screenings for adolescents, and HIV prevention medications like PrEP – effectively freezing preventive care standards as they existed in 2010.

If they side with the Appeals court, only Braidwood employees would be excluded from getting coverage for preventive health services.

The Supreme Court might even throw out all the currently mandatory coverage for preventive health services. 

Without mandated coverage, many insurers will reintroduce copays or exclude certain preventive services altogether, causing decreased use of preventive care resulting in delayed diagnoses, higher healthcare costs, and widened health disparities.

The ACA’s preventive service mandates will remain in effect until the Supreme Court makes their decision later this summer.

Oral arguments in the case will be held Monday, with a decision this Summer.

Court to hear challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage – SCOTUSblog

Legislative Update: April 19, 2025

The AZ legislative session is in a bit of a stasis right now.

No doubt you’ve heard about the standoff between Hobbs & the majority at the legislature regarding funding for services for folks with developmental disabilities.

Last week Hobbs told the legislature she’ll be vetoing any new bills that arrive at her desk until the DD funding shortfall for the current fiscal year is resolved – hence the stasis.

Gov. Hobbs declares moratorium on all bills until disabilities funding passes | Arizona Capitol Times

I expect final votes on bills will be suspended next week – with the major activity being back and forth between the House and Senate on bills that have passed each chamber but in different forms.

No doubt there will also be internal discussions about the DD funding shortfall as well.

I don’t know if there will be any Director Nominations committee hearings next week. Nothing is posted yet. Several nominees haven’t had their hearings yet (including AHCCCS, ADHS, and ADEQ). 

Below is the main list of bills that we’ve weighed in on this session and their status. 

Senate

SB1019 photo enforcement; traffic (AzPHA opposes) Still Alive
SB1071 SNAP TANF verification (AzPHA Opposed) SENT To GOV
SB1108 international medical licenses; provisional licensing (no Position)

SB1308 sober living homes regulation (AZPHA Supports) SIGNED
SB1612 RFP document retention; AHCCCS (No Position) PASSED BOTH Sent Back to Senate w Changes
SB1347 comprehensive dental; ahcccs (AzPHA Supports) Died
SB1604 licensed secure health facility; defendants (AzPHA Supports) PASSED BOTH Sent Back to Senate w Changes
SB1623 GME appropriations (AzPHA Supports) Died

House

HB2001 behavioral health temporary licenses (AzPHA Supports) Conference Committee

HB2012 emergency use products; employers (AzPHA Opposed) VETOED

HB2130 claims; prior authorization (AzPHA Supports) Died

HB2058 immunization proof; higher education (AzPHA Opposed) VETOED

HB2063 parental notification; school immunizations (AzPHA Opposes) VETOED

HB2125 insurance coverage; hearing aids (AzPHA Supports) Died

HB2126 medical records; parental choice (AzPHA Opposes) VETOED

HB2145 registered sanitarians; qualifications (AzPHA Supports) SIGNED

HB2164 school lunches; ultra processed food (AzPHA Supports) SIGNED

HB2165 SNAP; prohibited purchases (AzPHA No Position)VETOED

HB2175 claims; prior auth; company conduct (AzPHA Supports) LANGUISHING

HB2176 training; investigations; complaints (AzPHA Neutral) ON LIFE SUPPORT

HB2257 DCS, vaccination; child placement (AzPHA No Position) ON GOVS DESK

HB2291 opioids, red cap packaging (AzPHA Supports) SIGNED

HB2449 AHCCCS presumptive eligibility (AzPHA Opposed) CONFERENCE COMMITTEE

HB2894 Silver alert criteria (AzPHA Supports) LANGUISHING

AHCCCS Asks Permission to Implement Work Requirements & Five-Year Benefit Limit

AHCCCS just turned in their waiver request to the CMS asking permission to implement work reporting requirements and establish a five-year lifetime limit on Medicaid benefits for certain adults.

The proposal aligns with Senate Bill 1092 (enacted in 2015) which requires AHCCCS to annually ask CMS permission to implement a work requirement & 5-year lifetime benefit cap for able bodied adults.

See the Final Submitted Waiver Request

As you might expect – the real key in the waiver is the definition of who is ‘able bodied.’

AHCCCS’ proposal has a long list of categories of adults that are exempted because they’re not considered ‘able bodied.’ More on that in a bit.

Once approved by CMS (which will happen unless they think AHCCCS was too generous with excluding populations), “able-bodied adults” aged 19 to 55 would need to engage in at least 20 hours per week of qualifying activities like a job, school attendance or participation in “Employment Support and Development” programs in order to keep their Medicaid coverage.

There will also be a 5-year lifetime limit for Medicaid enrollment in AZ for “able-bodied adults”. ​

Exempt Populations:

  • People who are at least 56 years old;
  • Those who qualify for services through the Indian Health Service or Tribally-Operated Health Facilities;
  • Native Americans;
  • Women up to the end of the 12-month postpartum;
  • Former Arizona foster youth up to age 26;
  • People determined to have a serious mental illness or who have have a qualifying SMI diagnosis;
  • Those in active treatment with respect to a substance use disorder;
  • People receiving temporary or permanent long-term disability benefits from a private insurer or the government;
  • Individuals who are receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Cash Assistance, or Unemployment Insurance income benefits;
  • People who are exempt from ADES’ SNAP Work Requirement programs;
  • Individuals who are determined to be medically frail; 
  • Individuals who have an acute medical condition (physical and/or behavioral) that would prevent them from following the requirements;
  • Full-time high school students who are older than 18 years old;
  • Full-time trade school, college, or graduate students;
  • Victims of domestic violence; 
  • People taking part in AHCCCS Works;
  • Individuals who are homeless or who were recently homeless for up to six months post-housing; 
  • Individuals who have recently been directly affected by a catastrophic event such as a natural disaster; 
  • Parents, caretaker relatives, foster parents, and legal guardians, and caregivers of individuals diagnosed with SMI;
  • Caregivers of a family member who is enrolled in the Arizona Long-Term Care System (ALTCS);
  • Individuals who were incarcerated within the last six months; or
  • Veterans regardless of the discharge status.

Effective implementation will depend on AHCCCS’s ability to cross-reference databases to find exempt individuals, collaborating with agencies like ADES, Social Security etc. for data sharing.

Additionally, it’ll be super important to set up user-friendly systems for “able-bodied” members to report their work, school attendance, or ESD program participation is crucial to prevent unnecessary loss of coverage due to documentation challenges.​

I expect the work program and the 5-year benefit limit for able bodied adults to begin October 1, 2025.

See the Final Submitted Waiver Request

AHCCCS Seeks Public Input on Proposed Medicaid Work Requirements & 5-Year Lifetime Limit on Benefits – AZ Public Health Association