Allan Williams, MPH, PhD
While the death toll from the Covid pandemic is usually measured by Covid deaths, these deaths do not reflect the full impact of the pandemic on mortality. A more complete measure of pandemic-related deaths includes all causes of excess mortality during the pandemic. AZ has had the unfortunate distinction of leading the nation in the percent of excess pandemic-related deaths during 2020 -2022 compared to pre-pandemic levels. While most of the excess deaths are attributable to the largely preventable high rate of Covid deaths in Arizona, many other causes of death were also elevated during the pandemic. Indeed, the CDC estimates that since 2/1/2020, Arizona has experienced 3,020 excess heart disease deaths, 2,223 excess strokes, 3,307 hypertensive diseases, 3,569 excess cancer deaths, 5,174 excess Alzheimer and dementia deaths, and 1,531 excess diabetes deaths.
The CDC National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) has provided frequent updates on the numbers and percent of weekly, monthly, and yearly excess deaths since the start of the pandemic. While 2020 and 2021 death counts are considered “final” and complete counts of deaths, 2022 data is several months away from final status and is still considered provisional although mostly complete. 2023 data is considered both provisional and incomplete due to the lag in completing a death certificate after death, submitting the data to NCHS, and data processing. Consequently, data for recent weeks undercount observed deaths and would result in underestimates of excess deaths. To address this undercount, NCHS provides “weighted” estimates of deaths that occurred in 2022 and 2023. The weighting factor is applied to the death counts and is based on comparisons between provisional and final deaths during previous years by week, state, and for various lag times. In the following charts, NCHS weighted estimates of observed death counts were utilized to determine the percent of excess deaths from all causes for both Arizona and the US. This first chart shows the estimated percent of weekly excess deaths during the pandemic for every week between 02/01/20 and 07/15/23 for Arizona and the US. This chart shows that the peaks in excess death in Arizona were typically much higher than the US peaks. It also shows that in both AZ and the US, excess deaths have declined dramatically several months into 2023, approaching pre-pandemic levels. NCHS also estimated that there were 40,712 excess deaths in AZ and 1,335,688 excess deaths in the US over that time period. The second chart shows the overall percent of excess deaths during the pandemic by race and ethnicity. Except for the “Other” race category, the percent of excess deaths significantly exceeded the US percent of excess deaths. For all categories combined, Arizona experienced a 31.6% excess of all cause deaths during the pandemic, while the US experienced a 19.2% excess. Editorial Note by Will Humble: Arizona’s terrible (and lethal) performance during the pandemic was not bad luck. It was largely due to former governor Ducey and former ADHS director Christ’s unwillingness to implement well-established interventions to mitigate the spread of the virus. In the summer of 2020, it was the fact they had no enforced mitigation in bars, nightclubs and restaurants – leading to the lethal summer of 2020. The lethal January and February 2021 was also largely due to the lack of mitigation in those environments. The 3rd wave of excess deaths in late 2021 and early 2022 was largely due to the governor’s executive orders that thwarted efforts to improve community vaccination levels (e.g. their ‘vaccine passport executive order). |
|
|
|
|
AzPHA Resolutions on Women’s Reproductive Rights Go Back to 1938
Many of AzPHA’s public health priorities are driven by Resolutions that are approved by our members. AzPHA has dozens of Resolutions in place dating back to the 1930s. They are all available on our Wild Apricot site: https://azpha.wildapricot.org/sys/website/?pageId=1465233
Early resolutions focused on the importance of food safety regulations, tuberculosis control, family planning, and other contemporary public health issues. More recent Resolutions have focused on support for addressing the Opioid epidemic, certifying community health workers, and addressing electronic cigarettes. Our Resolutions are important to us because they set our public health advocacy priorities.
AzPHA Resolutions stay in place until and unless the Members vote to remove or update a Resolution. There is a process for developing new Resolutions. Resolutions are developed by AzPHA Members and are forwarded to the Board for review. Members must approve all Resolutions.
AzPHA has a long history of promoting family planning, women’s reproductive rights and access to legal and safe abortion care, with AzPHA members having ratified 8 Resolutions over the years. Our Resolutions:
1938 Support for Local Birth Control Clinics
1938 Proper Medical Supervision in Birth Control Clinics
1971 Liberalization or Abolishment of Current Arizona Laws Concerning Abortion
1971 Family Planning Information & Services
1981 Opposition to Constitutional Amendments or Statutes that Prohibit Abortion
1981 Male Involvement in Family Planning
2018 Continuing Support of Title X: The Nation’s Family Planning Program
2018 Supporting Universal Access to Contraception
__________________________________________________
Here’s a Full Compilation of AzPHA’s Resolutions Going Back to 1935:
1935 Request change in the recording of deaths Download
1935 Appreciation to Governor B. B. Moeur, designating him an honorary member of the Association Download
1935 Gratitude to the Surgeon General of the U.S. for sending representatives to the Association meeting Download
1935 Appointment of a special legislative committee to advise and consult with State Legislature on laws affecting public health affairs Download
*1938 Support for local Birth Control Clinics Download
*1938 Proper medical supervision in Birth Control Clinics (#6) Download
1947 Support of the Central Arizona Project Download
1951 Consideration of funds for Civil Defense Download
1951 Study of Public Health employee salaries with a view to periodic adjustment of basic salaries to fit rising cost of living Download
1953 Support of legislature to halt spread of T.B. Download
1953 Nurses’ section of AzPHA opposed to use of Jerome Hospital for State T.B. Hospital: supports construction of new hospital in more accessible areas Download
1953 Recommendation: All children in Az should be eligible for Crippled Children’s Care Download
1953 Availability of Public Health Nursing Service in every county Download
1957 Registration Act for Sanitarians Download
1957 Support of Az State Nurses Association on certification of school nurses Download
1957 Public Health agencies should urge their employees to take advantage of opportunities for Public Health Education and Provide educational leave for this purpose Download
1964 Recommend to President Lyndon Johnson that George Marx be appointed the Federal Water Pollution Advisory Control Board Download
1964 Solid Waste legislation Download
1965 Proposal: School Health Education Download
1967 Registration of Sanitarians Download
1967 Governor to designate the State Health Department as Health Planning Agency under P. L. 89-749 Download
1969 Preparation for Family Life within educational system Download
1969 Registration of Sanitarians Download
1969 Regulation and Licensing of labor Camps Download
*1971 Liberalization or abolishment of current Arizona Laws concerning abortion Download
1971 Preventative health Download
*1971 Family planning (birth control) information and services Download
1971 Legislated Health Practice Areas Download
1971Health Data Systems Download
1971 Relationship between Social Services and Economic Planning Download
1972 Fluoridation of water to optimal levels Download
1975 Establishment of Lloyd E. Burton Scholarship Download
1976 Vote No on Prop 300 – auto inspection Download
1976 Comprehensive health medical care through Medicaid Download
1976 Delegate authority for meat and milk control to Arizona State Department of Health Services Download
1977 Allocation of funds for immunization Download
1977 Family Life Education in schools Download
1977 Commends State Legislature for passage of H.B. 2047 – inspection of meat and dairy Download
1977 Commends Governor Raul Castro for support of Medicaid and expressing disappointment toward attitude of State Legislature Download
1977 Promote DEFEAT of the Hyde Anti-abortion Amendment and that Countries’ Boards of Supervisors provide funds for elective abortions Download
1978 Dispensing Drugs by nurses in rural areas Download
1978 Endorsement of E.R.A. Download
1980 Support for the wider role of the RN Practitioner Download
1980 Prioritized list of health concerns – Download
1980 Proposition 106 and Public Health Services passed unanimously Download
*1981 AzPHA supports the resolution of the Arizona Right to Choose, Inc., which unconditionally opposes Constitutional Amendments or Statutes to prohibit abortions Download
1981 Concerning Location of Services in an Indigent Health Care Program – passed Download
1981 Supporting development of an M.P.H. Degree in Arizona – passed Download
1981 Encouraging Legislature to Fund Comprehensive Disease Control Services – passed Download
1981 Concerning a state-funded office or rural health – passed Download
1981Encouraging Legislature to Fund Comprehensive Maternal and Child Health Services – passed Download
1981 Proposed resolution by APHA on “Male Involvement in Family Planning” – passed Download
1982 Endorsing the nomination of Alvin Robert Leonard, M.D., M.P.H. for the Sedgwick Memorial Medal Awarded by APHA – passed Download
1982 Request President to encourage FDA to enact regulations for labeling of sodium content of foods by 9/30/83; and petition AZ State Legislature to enact legislation requiring foods processed in AZ be labeled for sodium content Download
1983 Oppose the development and deployment of nuclear weapons Download
1983 Public access to data collected by AHCCCS program; foster public discussion of future of AHCCS; work toward expansion of the program Download
1983 AzPHA apply the AZ Sanitarians’ Registration Council for approval for valid continuing education credits for Sanitarians Download
1983 AzPHA actively support efforts to cause the AZ Legislature to appropriate funds to implementation of S.B. 1264. mandating perinatal services Download
1983 AzPHA seek legislative and regulatory support for development and implementation of a continuum of long term care services for the elderly and disabled, including home health care, and the utilization of the Title XIX funds in state of AZ Download
1983 AzPHA expresses to officials of Nogales, Sonora, its deepest concern effects of the flooding; and for the hospitality and friendship the officials and citizens of Nogales, Sonora have shown and pledge to promote to continue that same hospitality and friendship in AZ Download
1984 Increase drinking age to 21 Download
1984 call for action for ADHS director for smoking policy of ADHS Download
1985 AzPHA calls for major increases in funding for AIDS prevention and public education against discrimination Download
1985 Adoption of resolutions on smoke free hospitals Download
1986 Urge Hospitals and other health care providers to recruit Spanish-speaking professional staff, interpreters Download
1986 Reduce and/ or eliminate smoking from enclosed public places Download
1986 Requirement that all insurance carriers in AZ accept assignment of risks for voluntary and small non-profit health care programs Download
1986 Discourage the use and promotion of smoking products including smokeless tobacco Download
1987 Primary Health Care Download
1987 Student Loan Program Download
1987 AZ area Health Education centers Download
1987 Oppose proposed Title X regulations Download
1988 Oppose Registered Care Technologists, propose ways to alleviate the Nursing Shortage Download
1989 Impact of Webster Decision – reaffirms previous pro-choice stance Download
1989 Hazardous waste management Download
1989 Protecting Confidentiality of AIDS services Download
1989 Services to HIV infected individuals Download
1989 Supporting voluntary HIV testing Download
1989 Restricting mandatory HIV testing Download
1989 School Immunization Requirements Download
1989 AZ Pharmacists filling prescriptions written by foreign physicians – supports Download
1990 Health care for all Arizonans Download
1990 Basic Public Health Services Download
1992 Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and treatment programsDownload
1993 smoke free campus Download
1993 tobacco vending machines Download
1993 tobacco retail licensing Download
1993 Tobacco Excise tax Download
1994 Repeal of S.B. 1053 Download
1994 Public Health in Health Care Reform Download
1995 Support state resources for Arizona Health Education Center Download
1997 Support local, state, and national efforts to prevent, control and remedy environmental pollution Download
1998 Support activities as an organization, in coalitions or individuals to reduce incidence of domestic violence Download
1998 Prevent abuse of antibiotics Download
2000 Folic Acid Prevention and Neutral Tube defects Download
2000 Abolition of the Death Penalty Download
2000 Childhood Asthma Download
2000 First Oral Health Assessment Download
2000 Injury and violence prevention, and control programs in the state and local health departments Download
2003 Osteoporosis Prevention Download
2003 Perinatal mortality review Download
2003 Primary seat belt law Download
2005 Pharmacies and Pharmacists – Duty to Fill Prescriptions Download
2005 Adolescent Access to Comprehensive, Confidential Reproductive Health Care Download
2005 Hold AzPHA Meetings in Smokefree Cities Download
2005 Fairness in Domestic Partnerships for All Arizonans Download
2005 Protecting Environmental Quality and Health Download
2005 Support for Land Use and Transportation Policies to Promote Public Health Download
2005 Support the Tobacco Free Arizona Initiative Download
2005 Promoting Public Health and Education Goals through Coordinated School Health Programs Download
2006 Support Public Health infrastructure Download
2007 Health Care for Uninsured Download
2008 Comprehensive Approach to Health Disparities Elimination in Arizona Download
2009 Tax on Sugar Sweetened Beverages Download
2009 Breastfeeding Support at Worksites Download
2009 Actions to Reduce the Public Health Impacts of Climate Change Download
2013 AzPHA Recommends Adopting APHA Policy #201119: Increasing Efforts to Encourage Governmental Health Departments to Seek Accreditation Download
2013 Annual Influenza Vaccination Requirements for Health Workers Download
2015 Expanded Family and Medical Leave Download
2015 Supporting Regulation of Electronic Cigarettes Download
2016 Universal Access to Oral Healthcare for Pregnant Women in Arizona Download
2016 Reducing Non-Medically Indicated Elective Inductions of Labor Download
2016 Prevention and Intervention Strategies to Decrease Misuse of Prescription Pain Medication Download
2016 Support for Community Health Worker Leadership in Determining Workforce Standards for Training and Credentialing Download
2016 Regulating Commercially Legalized Marijuana as a Public Health Priority Download
2017 Restrict Tobacco Sales to Persons 21 and Over in Arizona Download
2017 Restrict Texting While Driving in Arizona Download
2017 Require 50 minutes of Unstructured Recess in Arizona Elementary Schools (K-5) Download
2018 Prevent Firearm Violence in Schools Download
*2018 Continuing Support of Title X – The Nation’s Family Planning Program Download
*2018 Supporting Universal Access to Contraception Download
2019 Updated the Firearm Violence in Schools Resolution to include community firearm violence prevention – Download.
2021 Elimination of the Use of Conversion Therapy Practices for LGBTQ Individuals
2021 End of Life Autonomy
2023 NEW: Structural Racism is a Public Health Crisis: Opportunities for Intervention
Arizona Supreme Court to Hear Abortion Care Case Appeal
The Arizona Supreme Court has agreed to hear and decide which of Arizona’s conflicting statutes about abortion care are the law of the land. Arizona has at least 2 competing statutes in the books. A law from 1864 and recoded in 1901 says that abortion care is illegal unless the procedure is needed to save the life of the mother.
ARS 13-3603. Definition; punishment A person who provides, supplies or administers to a pregnant woman, or procures such woman to take any medicine, drugs or substance, or uses or employs any instrument or other means whatever, with intent thereby to procure the miscarriage of such woman, unless it is necessary to save her life, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not less than two years nor more than five years.
A competing law from 2022, ARS 36-2322, states that abortion care is legal up to 15 weeks gestation, and beyond 15 weeks in a ‘medical emergency’.
ARS 36-2322 (B): B. Except in a medical emergency, a physician may not intentionally or knowingly perform, induce, or attempt to perform or induce an abortion if the probable gestational age of the unborn human being has been determined to be greater than fifteen weeks.
The state supreme court said last week they’ll hear the case (Planned Parenthood v Brnovich). The court didn’t release a date for oral arguments, so it’s impossible to predict when an eventual ruling might come out. If the court rules that the 1864/1901 law applies, legal abortions would effectively end in Arizona “unless it is necessary to save her life”.
When the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs ruling came out, former Republican Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich was able to convince a Pima County Superior Court judge to lift a 1973 injunction stopping implementation of Arizona’s territorial-era law outlawing abortion, and for a few months, abortions were illegal in Arizona beginning on September 24, 2022.
Planned Parenthood appealed that ruling, and in December 2022, a 3-judge panel of the Arizona Court of Appeals overturned the Pima County court ruling, saying that 2022 law limiting abortions to less than 15 weeks gestation and the 1864/1901 law could be “harmonized”… legalizing abortion care up to 15 weeks again… which is where it stands today.
Expect a main component of the arguments to focus on the session law that accompanied the passage of 2022’ SB1161 (the 15-week law) which stated in the legislative intent section that: This act does not:
“… Repeal, by implication or otherwise, section 13-3603 (the territorial era ban), Arizona Revised Statutes, or any other applicable state law regulating or restricting abortion.”
Expect the Alliance Defending Freedom (the group now representing Arizona’s 1964 law) to argue that the language above makes it clear the Legislature and Governor Ducey intended the 1864/1901 abortion to come back into effect if Roe were to be overturned, which of course it was.
Until the AZ Supreme Court makes its ruling, abortion care will likely remain legal up to 15 weeks gestation.
Planned Parenthood and other stakeholders have launched a plan to place an amendment in Arizona’s Constitution that would legalize abortion care up to the point of viability (about 24 weeks). See: Advocates to pass a ballot measure legalizing abortion in 2024.
That measure would require 383,923 valid signatures by July 2024 to make the ballot, will need to survive legal challenges to keep it off the ballot. If it survives that, voters will need to approve it by 50% plus one vote.
See: Reproductive-Rights-in-Arizona-1884-2022
Arizona Supreme Court to decide whether to reinstate 1864 abortion ban (azcentral.com)
Ray Stern Arizona Republic
CDC MMWR Explains their Recommendation that Kids <8mos Entering RSV Season Get the New RSV Monoclonal Antibody Injection
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization among U.S. infants. In July 2023, the Food and Drug Administration approved nirsevimab, a long-acting monoclonal antibody, for passive immunization to prevent RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection among infants and young children.
On August 3, 2023, ACIP recommended nirsevimab for all infants aged <8 months who are born during or entering their first RSV season and for infants and children aged 8–19 months who are at increased risk for severe RSV disease and are entering their second RSV season.
On the basis of pre–COVID-19 pandemic patterns, nirsevimab could be administered in most of the US from October through the end of March. Nirsevimab can prevent severe RSV disease among infants and young children at increased risk for severe RSV disease.
The cost will be $495 for private health insurance. The government (VFC) price will be $395. CDC says the ROI pencils out at that price (e.g., preventing hospitalizations etc.).
WIC in Jeopardy in AZ as Counties Consider Dropping the Program: Finances Making Running WIC Untenable
Congress Needs to Pass the Pass the Healthy Meals, Healthy Kids Act (H.R.8450) Including Changes to TITLE III—Modernizing WIC
Child Nutrition Reauthorization (including reauthorizing the WIC program) comes up for renewal every five years, but Congress hasn’t reauthorized or updated the provisions and funding in the Act since 2010.
You heard that right. Congress hasn’t updated the statutes or funding in the WIC program since 2010 – thirteen years ago. The current law, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-296), expired in 2015.
Child Nutrition Reauthorization Resources | National WIC Association
Ever since then Congress has just been kicking the can down the road and keeping the programs as-is through the annual appropriations process, via something called a continuing resolution – which allows them to continue to work.
However, this means we are 8 years overdue for changes that are needed to make federal child nutrition programs workable – especially WIC. The most urgent needs are to modernize and update WIC benefits and funding to account for increased costs due to inflation.
Federal reimbursement for WIC has gotten so bad that some county health departments are considering dropping their WIC programs. The word on the street is that nobody else will pick up the slack when a county quits because the business case is now upside down in WIC.
How Does WIC Work?
WIC is a federally funded program that supplies important nutritional services and support for eligible pregnant and postpartum individuals and their children until age 5. WIC uses nutritional education, breastfeeding support, nutrition help, and referrals to more services as mechanisms to improve the health of the low-income individuals it serves.
Family income needs to be below 185% of the federal poverty limit in order to qualify (slightly more generous than AZ’s Medicaid participation standard)
WIC money goes to states who further manage the overall program. ADHS mostly distributes the money to the county health departments and federally qualified health centers to implement WIC programming.
Arizona currently has 140 WIC clinics (run by 33 agencies) serving 165,422 individuals.
Funding for WIC flows through the US Department of Agriculture but Congress authorizes the amount. Way back in 2010 congresses’ appropriations covered the costs associated with implementing WIC programs… but that’s no longer the case – mostly because the Act is now 13 years old.
Some states and local clinics may supplement this funding to improve access or more services. The State of Arizona does not, but a couple of counties do.
WIC Participation at a Glance
– 37% of AZ-born infants are on WIC,
– 87% of WIC participants are on AHCCCS (Medicaid),
– 52% of eligible Arizonans (mothers and children) participate in WIC,
– $21,213 average family income,
– $47.7M spent at AZ food retailers.
WIC is Becoming Unsustainable for Counties & FQHCs
WIC clinics (counties, FQHC’s, tribes) get their money based on a formula that includes caseload and food costs into consideration… but the funding formula hasn’t been updated in 13 years.
Staffing costs currently present the biggest challenge to local clinics, especially for clinics with large service areas. Insufficient pay and high workload lead to short staffing.
As a result, short-staffed clinics are unable to spend adequate time with each client or keep up with their caseload. When clinics fall short of their caseload, their funding drops for the next year, causing a cascade.
WIC has a Return on Investment of 3x
The United States has experienced inflation near 40% since 2010, when WIC funding was last adjusted and reauthorized. WIC benefits now have less buying power, lessening the incentive to take part in the program.
Studies suggest that every $1 spent on WIC results in up to a $3.13 reduction in spending for Medicaid programs. This is particularly pertinent given the large overlap between WIC and Medicaid recipients. Reductions in poor health outcomes because of nutrition aid programs such as WIC are also expected to save significant amounts in private healthcare as well.
AzPHA Recommendations
Congress needs to pass the Healthy Meals, Healthy Kids Act (H.R.8450) now. HR 8450 would save WIC by:
- Updating funding formulas to actually cover staffing and administrative costs;
- Modernizing WIC benefits to include online shopping (easier participation); and
- Evaluating effectiveness of telehealth for WIC visits (makes participation easier).
Resources
Influenza Vaccine Makeup for this Fall
Each spring in the Northern Hemisphere scientists get together and examine global surveillance data (from both hemispheres) and decide what strains should be included in the upcoming flu season’s vaccine.
It’s important to get it right because how effective the vaccine ends up being depends on whether it correctly guesses what antigens to target. FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) met back in March to select the strains to focus on for the 2023-2024 U.S. influenza season.
The committee recommended that the vaccines for the U.S. 2023-2024 influenza season have the following antigens for the egg-based vaccines. The strain below in bold is the one that has been updated from last year’s shot:
- A/Victoria/4897/2022 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus;
- A/Darwin/9/2021 (H3N2)-like virus;
- B/Austria/1359417/2021-like virus (B/Victoria lineage);
- B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (B/Yamagata lineage).
For trivalent influenza vaccines for use in the U.S. for the 2023-2024 influenza season, depending on the manufacturing method of the vaccine, the committee recommended A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) and B/Austria/1359417/2021-like virus (B/Victoria lineage).
How well flu vaccine works can depend in part on the match between the vaccine viruses and circulating viruses. Preliminary estimates show that last season, people who were vaccinated against flu were about 40% to 70% less likely to be hospitalized because of flu illness or related complications.
Public Health Journalism This Week
AZ may permanently pay parent caregivers. Public comment ends Monday (azcentral.com)
Maricopa County heat-associated deaths jump to 89 so far in 2023 (azcentral.com)
Summer COVID-19 surge, measles emerging in more adults – Arizona PBS (azpbs.org)
Gov. Katie Hobbs names new slate for Arizona-Mexico Commission (azcentral.com)
Here’s how Phoenix-area schools are handling COVID-19 this year (azcentral.com)
AHCCCS Exploring Making Parent Caregiver Reimbursement Permanent for ALTCS Members
Comments Due by 5pm Monday
In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic AHCCCS launched an initiative allowing AZ parents who are caregivers for children (minors) with disabilities (and enrolled in the long-term care system called ALTCS) to get paid for their caregiving.
The move was absolutely necessary at the time because so many caregivers were unable to work either because of risk factors or because they were in isolation or quarantine for long periods. Many caregivers dropped out of the workforce altogether or perished during the pandemic.
The initiative has been popular among parents who, for years, have struggled to find caregivers for their children. AHCCCS also saw benefits as the care network expanded greatly (one of their charges from their parent organization – the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or CMS).
See AHCCCS’ Parents as Paid Caregivers Waiver Request
AHCCCS has been exploring whether to make the program permanent, allowing parents who qualify to get reimbursed for “attendant” care (bathing, eating, grooming, and using the bathroom etc.) indefinitely. Note: The proposal doesn’t include reimbursement for “habilitation” care, which is more structured and goal oriented.
Right now, about 20% of the 17,000 kids enrolled in AHCCCS and living at home & receiving home and community-based services are getting their services from parents as the paid caregiver. The remaining 13,500 are being served by caregivers who are not their parents.
AHCCCS has been accepting comments on the proposal for some time now – but the final deadline to comment ends at 5pm Monday.
Comments may be submitted by 5pm Monday August 21 via e-mail to waiverpublicinput@azahcccs. gov
See: AZ may permanently pay parent caregivers. Public comment ends Monday
Phyllis Primus, BSN, MPH, PhD: A Live Well Lived
Arizona lost a long-time public health professional on July 18th when Phyllis Primas passed away.
In addition to groundbreaking academic and public health work at ASU, Phyllis worked at ADHS for several years in maternal & child health and later in nursing at Maricopa County Public Health.
Phyllis was a long-time member of AzPHA, joining in October 1976, shortly after arriving in Arizona for a teaching post at ASU.
She wasn’t just an AZPHA member… she was a long-time sustaining member at the ‘Patron’ level (a $500/year support level). Phyllis also served in several leadership positions on AzPHA Board of Directors, including a term as President.
Phyllis Primas, BSN, MPH, PhD. was born in Allentown, PA. She received her doctorate in higher education administration from the University of Pittsburgh. After graduation, she was Associate Director of a public health demonstration project in West Africa through the University of Pittsburgh.
She moved to Arizona in 1975 and accepted a position at the Arizona State University College of Nursing, teaching community health courses in the graduate program.
She also chaired thesis programs and was awarded a federal grant to develop and maintain a community health clinic for the homeless, Breaking the Cycle.
Phyllis left ASU in 1981 for a position at the Arizona Department of Health Services as Manager of Community Maternal and Child Health. In 1985, she was hired as the Director of Nursing at the Maricopa County Health Department and later returned to ASU.
She had a robust research and program planning profile, authoring many reports which you can see on this ASU Research Profile. She retired from ASU in 2002 as a Professor Emerita.
Other community involvements included as Associate Dean for the original UA College of Public Health. She was a founding member of AzPHA’s active retiree group that Barbara Burkholder hosts.
Phyllis Primus: A Live Well Lived
Global, National & Local Measles Update
Although measles was declared eliminated in the United States in 2000, almost 1,300 cases of measles were reported in 31 states in the U.S. in 2019— the greatest number since 1992. The 2019 U.S. measles outbreaks were all linked to travel-related cases that reached at-risk populations (un or under vaccinated against measles) in the United States.
Increase in Measles Cases — United States, January 1–April 26, 2019, | MMWR
Outbreaks can happen in areas where people may be unvaccinated or under-vaccinated, including the United States. Right now, measles outbreaks are occurring in every region of the world. Measles can enter the United States through infected travelers entering or travelling through to the U.S. as well as through infected U.S. travelers returning from other countries.
Top 10 Countries with Global Measles Outbreaks
Rank Country Number of Cases
1 India 67,592
2 Yemen 23,680
3 Pakistan 5,853
4 Cameroon 4,926
5 Nigeria 4,389
Over 61 million doses of measles-containing vaccine were postponed or missed due to COVID-19 related delays in supplementary immunization activities. This increases the risk of bigger outbreaks around the world, including the United States.
Childhood Vaccination Rates Continue to Drop In the 2021-2022 School Year
As the years have gone by, more and more people are becoming susceptible to measles. Pretty much everyone over 63 had measles as a kid and those that recovered have lifetime immunity. Cases of measles plummeted in the US after mass vaccination campaigns in the early 1960s. The US (and Arizona) enjoyed very high vaccination rates in the next 4 or 5 decades… but after that vaccination levels started declining coinciding with the ‘anti-vax’ movement.
Vaccination rates continued to slide over the last 10 years, and the statewide immunization rate for Kindergarteners now at 91%, well below the community immunity threshold for measles of 95%. Kids that don’t get caught up (or get vaccinated once they turn 18 because their parents had not vaccinated them as kids) will remain susceptible to infections as an adult. Cases of measles tend to be worse among kids under 5 and adults over 20. Measles Clinical Information
Right now, most susceptible people in the US are under 25 years old, as childhood measles vaccination rates were very high between 1963 and 2000. Most outbreaks of measles in the US these days are a result of a susceptible young adult (unvaccinated) travels abroad to a country with lots of measles and return to communities with low vaccination rates.
Vaccination rates aren’t uniform across the state. Yuma and Santa Cruz counties continue to enjoy the highest vaccination rates (above 95% for MMR among Kindergarteners). Yavapai consistently has the lowest vaccination rates with MMR coverage at only 74% and nearly 10% of students totally unvaccinated among Kindergarteners.
The ‘Vaccines for Children’ Program Is Critical to Maintaining Childhood Vaccination Rates… but Provider Participation Plummeted During the Ducey Administration
Another continuing trend… students enrolled in charter schools have vaccination rates much lower than students in district public schools. Also, higher income districts tend to have lower vaccination rates.
There are evidence-based strategies that can be implemented at a statewide level, but such initiatives require leadership by a state health department.
Interventions to increase pediatric vaccine uptake: An overview of recent findings
For information on school immunization requirements, review the Guides to Arizona Immunization Requirements for Child Care/Preschool and Grades K-12.