Takeaways:
- Slow Decline in New Cases Continue
- Hospital Influx Moderating but Rural Hospitals Unable to Transfer Patients as ADHS is Unwilling to Open Surge Line
- Mid September Deaths Now Exceed 300/Week
More evidence was published today in a new CDC MMWR showing that Governor Ducey’s hostility toward universal classroom masking is causing kids to get sick and miss out on in-person learning. Researchers from ASU, CDC and the Maricopa and Pima County health departments found that schools without a mask requirement were 350% more likely to have a COVID-19 outbreak than schools with a mask requirement in place at the start of school year.
The team examined COVID-19 outbreak data among 999 K-12 public, non-charter schools in Maricopa and Pima Counties during the first six-weeks of the school year from July 15 to August 31, 2021. After controlling for grade levels, enrollment size, Title 1 status, county school location & COVID-19 community case rates, schools without a mask requirement were 350% more likely to have an outbreak than schools that had a mask requirement in place at the start of the school year.
Among the 999 schools, 21% had a mask requirement when school started, 31% implemented a mask requirement a median of 15 days after school started and 48% had no mask requirement during the entire time period.
Of the 191 school-associated outbreaks in July and August, almost 60% occurred in schools without a mask requirement. Only 8% occurred in schools with a mask requirement in place at the start of the school year. About 1/3 of outbreaks occurred in schools with mask requirements implemented later in the year.
“In the crude analysis, the odds of a school-associated COVID-19 outbreak in schools with no mask requirement were 3.7 times higher than those in schools with an early mask requirement (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% CI = 2.2–6.5). After adjusting for potential described confounders, the odds of a school-associated COVID-19 outbreak in schools without a mask requirement were 3.5 times higher than those in schools with an early mask requirement (OR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.8–6.9).”
“In the two largest Arizona counties, with variable K–12 school masking policies at the onset of the 2021–22 academic year, the odds of a school-associated COVID-19 outbreak were 3.5 times higher in schools with no mask requirement than in those with a mask requirement implemented at the time school started. Lapses in universal masking contribute to COVID-19 outbreaks in school settings; CDC K–12 school guidance recommends multiple prevention strategies. Given the high transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant, universal masking, in addition to vaccination of all eligible students, staff members, and faculty and implementation of other prevention measures, remains essential to COVID-19 prevention in K–12 settings.”
Fortunately, courageous school districts have challenged the constitutionality of Governor Ducey’s prohibition of universal masking requirements in public schools, scheduled to kick in next Wednesday. Judge Katherine Cooper from the Maricopa County Superior Court heard the lawsuit filed by a coalition of organizations including the Arizona School Boards Association, the Children’s Action Alliance, the Arizona Education Association, and the Arizona Advocacy Network See the Complaint.
The suit asks the court for Injunctive Relief on the portions of the health and K-12 budget bills that prohibit school districts from implementing universal masking policies. The action rightly points out that the legislature passed, and the governor signed three budget bills (HB 2898, SB 1824, and SB 1825) that “… include substantive policy provisions that have nothing to do with the budget” in direct violation of the state constitution.
Regardless of how Cooper rules in the coming days, the case will be quickly appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court. I expect a Preliminary Injunction stopping the implementation of Ducey’s harmful policy will be issued pending a final ruling on the merits of the case.
The case has far-reaching implications. If the court holds that the Budget Bills were unconstitutional because they violate the single subject requirement, then those aspects of the BRB that pertain to the case will need to be excised.
The court could even rule that the budget reconciliation bills (BRBs) are unconstitutional in their entirety, which would result in a special legislative session to draw up a new state budget for 2022.
It’s too bad that we’re stuck with a Governor that is so hostile to science and who cares so little about whether kids are safe and have a chance at in-person learning.
Representatives of rural county hospitals in Cochise, Santa Cruz, Pima and Yuma Counties sent ADHS Interim Director Don Herrington a letter this week urging him to help them by facilitating patient transfers from saturated rural hospitals to urban facilities. Rural hospitals are very different from large urban hospital systems in that don’t have sister hospitals to smooth out care to meet patient needs.
One of the few successful initiatives that former Director Christ implemented was the Surge Line, which helped rural hospitals’ ability to transfer patients to other facilities. The Surge Line was critically important during the July and December – February hospital crises’ (precipitated by Governor Ducey and former Director Christ’s poor decision-making and operational failures).
Yesterday, Don sent this letter to those rural hospital representatives telling them to ‘Pound Sand’:
“The capacity challenges facing hospitals in the Southern region are similar across all regions of the state. Due to the healthcare staffing shortages across the entire state limiting available beds across the healthcare system, expansion of the Arizona Surge Line to all patient transfers is not currently a viable option to improve patient transfers. As you’ve stated, the most immediate way to bolster capacity and improve patient outcomes in Arizona is to enhance staffing in hospitals across the state. This initiative is currently underway with over 70 nurses contracted through the Surge Staffing Initiative expected to start in Arizona this week and nearly 200 expected to start by the end of September. Contracting for additional nurses is ongoing.”
Astonishingly, Interim Director Herrington said “no” we will not help you with patient transfers. Furthermore, he suggested that the solution will come when “…70 nurses contracted through the Surge Staffing Initiative” arrive in the state.
Are you kidding me? 70 nurses over 3 shifts can cover like 70 ICU patients. He really thinks that bringing in 70 nurses is going to solve the problems of a saturated rural hospital system?
Furthermore, the letter throws another shiny mirror into the corner of the room by again promoting Regeneron (a monoclonal antibody treatment that is marginally effective in some people with high-risk conditions very early in their infection). The Regeneron reference is clearly included in the letter to throw a bone to the governor. Many right-wing governors hostile to vaccine requirements and masking are touting Regeneron as a solution to saturated hospitals.
Governor Ducey has hopped on that hay-ride big time, and now it appears that Interim Director Herrington has too.
Those of us that were hoping that the leadership change at ADHS was going to make a difference are losing faith fast. I’ve lost it.
The Arizona Corporation Commission is hosting three virtual town halls this week on Tues., Sept. 21st; Wed., Sept. 22nd; and Sat., Sept. 25th to get input from stakeholders about their pending Clean Energy Rules and a recent report (the “Ascend Report”) that analyzed the costs of them.
If finalized later this fall, the Clean Energy Rules will modernize Arizona’s outdated policies for clean energy by enacting new requirements for APS and TEP to deliver 100% carbon-free electricity; expand programs that help customers save energy and money; and issue competitive bids as they invest in a growing power system.
The Ascend Report put its thumb on the scales against clean energy by relying on the utilities to conduct the modelling; failing to consider early closure dates for expensive, uneconomic coal plants; assuming gas to be the cheapest option, when in reality it is not; using inflated costs for wind, solar, and battery storage; and ignoring the many benefits of clean energy.
If the report is allowed to stand unquestioned, it could influence the Commission’s final vote to adopt the Clean Energy Rules or not. And, if regulators fail to adopt the Rules, Arizona will miss out on new jobs and economic development opportunities, as other states in the region adopt far more aggressive policies that hasten their transition away from fossil fuels and to clean energy.
While the Commission is hosting these town halls to take public comment on the report, it is also an opportunity to let Commissioners know how much you support clean energy and why they should act immediately to adopt the Rules. This moment is crucial, and your input could influence what Commissioners decide to do!
Join via Zoom:https://azcc.zoomgov.com/j/1619423958?pwd=cytTZlFJLzNDa2Eyb0ltRXFnVWxxdz0
Passcode: 439386
Webinar ID: 161 942 3958
Join via Zoom:
https://azcc.zoomgov.com/j/1611208892?pwd=UGhITFUwR2IrblZOM2JoNUJOdXR6QT09
Passcode: 183367
Webinar ID: 161 120 8892
Join via Telephone:
833-568-8864 (Toll Free)
Join via Zoom:
https://azcc.zoomgov.com/j/1612841002?pwd=TGdnUm1vdnh4WjdlelBQTG4wYlY3dz09
Passcode: 335983
Webinar ID:161 284 1002
Join via Telephone:
833-568-8864 (Toll Free)
President Biden built a $150 billion clean-energy plan into the Build Back Better initiative. The $150B investment will wean the U.S. power grid off carbon-based fuels by 2035. The plan would reduce the use of coal and natural gas substituting non carbon sources.
The idea is to use financial incentives to make non carbon fuels lower cost- driving the energy production market toward greener sources of energy. For example, energy suppliers would be eligible for grants if they increase the amount of clean electricity supplied to customers by 4% compared with the previous year.
Other highlights of the plan before congress include funding electric-grid improvements, decarbonizing federal buildings and vehicle fleets, providing home and appliance efficiency rebates, and subsidizing solar projects in low-income communities.
The plan is part of the larger budget reconciliation package working its way through congress. Budget reconciliation bills only need a majority in the Senate, rather than the usual 60 votes needed to break a filibuster. An open question is whether all Democratic members of the Senate will vote for the package- and specifically the energy efficiency and non-carbon energy source portions of the package.
AzPHA participated in this press conference last week with a main goal of letting Senators Sinema and Kelly as well as Representative O’Halloran the importance of making sure that the green portions of the budget reconciliation package make it into the final budget. Here’s the story in the Republic about that presser: Arizona advocates urge Congress to address climate change.
The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) met to discuss Pfizer-BioNTech’s supplemental Biologics License Application for administration of a third dose, or “booster” dose, of the COVID-19 vaccine for all persons 16 years of age and older last Friday.
The staff of the FDA declined to take a stance on whether to back booster shots of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine in their report to the VRBPAC, saying U.S. regulators haven’t verified all the available data.
Pfizer’s application to amend their license for their vaccine was based on observational data from Israel rather than actual clinical trials or studies. FDA staff said observational studies have suggested declining efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine over time against symptomatic infection while others have not.
The committee (VRBPAC) voted 16-2 to NOT recommend amending Pfizer’s vaccine license to include a 3rd booster shot for all populations. Later that afternoon, the Committee voted to recommend that the Commissioner add and Emergency Use Authorization (not approval) for the booster in folks 65+ and those with medical conditions that put them at substantial risk. That recommendation was largely symbolic, as clinicians can already use the Pfizer vaccine off-label.
The CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunizations Practices will likely meet next week to decide whether to recommend the booster to the elderly and those with medical conditions that put them at risk. At some point, the ACIP will need to meet and make a recommendation for persons that had the Janssen & Moderna vaccines (regarding boosters). Clinicians and patients increasingly have questions about whether elderly persons that got the Janssen vaccine get a Pfizer booster.
Editorial Notes: Another global health equity is at play when it comes to routinely providing booster shots with little if any clinical benefit when persons in the developing world haven’t even had an opportunity to get a single dose yet. For example, only 1.3% of persons in Africa have been vaccinated. Even if FDA ends up approving the Pfizer booster, the CDC and ACIP should examine those global health equity issues before recommending a booster to already protected Americans, when those doses could and should go to developing nations.
I believe that the Biden Administration learned (or should have learned) an important lesson this week. Several weeks ago the Surgeon General and the CDC and NIH Directors expressed full-throated support for universal boosters before data supported that decision. As we saw last week, that support was not only premature, but it short-circuited the normal approval process.
Last week Attorney General Brnovich filed a ‘lawsuit’ in federal court challenging Biden’s announcement that he is asking OSHA to issue an emergency rule requiring employers with more than 100 staff to make sure their team is vaccinated or undergo weekly testing.
The thing is that OSHA hasn’t even proposed the regulation yet!
Nevertheless, the Brnovich filed the lawsuit to challenge a NONEXISTANT regulation! If he were interested in changing public policy regarding vaccine mandates, he would have waited to file a suit until OSHA promulgates a rule.
Of course, his goal wasn’t to influence policy… his purpose was to get the attention of the bookers on FOX News and Newsmax and get him on national television – where his Republican primary voters reside. Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich sues over Biden vaccine rules
In that sense, Mission Accomplished.
The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) met to discuss Pfizer-BioNTech’s supplemental Biologics License Application for administration of a third dose, or “booster” dose, of the COVID-19 vaccine for all persons 16 years of age and older last Friday.
The staff of the FDA declined to take a stance on whether to back booster shots of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine in their report to the VRBPAC, saying U.S. regulators haven’t verified all the available data.
Pfizer’s application to amend their license for their vaccine was based on observational data from Israel rather than actual clinical trials or studies. FDA staff said observational studies have suggested declining efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine over time against symptomatic infection while others have not.
The committee (VRBPAC) voted 16-2 to NOT recommend amending Pfizer’s vaccine license to include a 3rd booster shot for all populations. Later that afternoon, the Committee voted to recommend that the Commissioner add and Emergency Use Authorization (not approval) for the booster in folks 65+ and those with medical conditions that put them at substantial risk. That recommendation was largely symbolic, as clinicians can already use the Pfizer vaccine off-label.
The CDC’s Advisory Committee for Immunizations Practices will likely meet next week to decide whether to recommend the booster to the elderly and those with medical conditions that put them at risk. At some point, the ACIP will need to meet and make a recommendation for persons that had the Janssen & Moderna vaccines (regarding boosters). Clinicians and patients increasingly have questions about whether elderly persons that got the Janssen vaccine get a Pfizer booster.
Editorial Notes: Another global health equity is at play when it comes to routinely providing booster shots with little if any clinical benefit when persons in the developing world haven’t even had an opportunity to get a single dose yet. For example, only 1.3% of persons in Africa have been vaccinated. Even if FDA ends up approving the Pfizer booster, the CDC and ACIP should examine those global health equity issues before recommending a booster to already protected Americans, when those doses could and should go to developing nations.
I believe that the Biden Administration learned (or should have learned) an important lesson this week. Several weeks ago the Surgeon General and the CDC and NIH Directors expressed full-throated support for universal boosters before data supported that decision. As we saw last week, that support was not only premature, but it short-circuited the normal approval process.
From Dr. Gerald:
Once again, more good news than bad. Case counts continue to trend down slowly in most places except Greenlee County which is nearing its all-time pandemic high. Despite modest improvements in transmission, test positivity continues to inch up unexpectedly after the Labor Day holiday.
September is Suicide Prevention Awareness Month. AHCCCS manages the COVID-19 Emergency Response Suicide Prevention (ERSP) grant which provides suicide screening and follow-up services in Pima County to those uninsured and underinsured with suicidal ideation who are 25 years of age and older.
This screening occurs primarily in emergency departments, psychiatric facilities, and through crisis line referrals. Through Arizona Complete Health (AzCH) and a contract with CODAC, CODAC Behavioral Health Technicians (BHTs) will screen individuals in emergency departments and inpatient psychiatric facilities for suicidal ideation and identify/screen those persons who may have been or are at risk of domestic violence.
This simple screening of individuals who are experiencing suicidal ideation can go a long way toward preventing suicide because it ensures that they receive appropriate care and support, as well as follow-up services to lessen the chances of a future suicide attempt. Additional preventative follow-up services offered through CODAC include 24/7 emotional support while stabilizing someone in crisis, help with coping skills, and increased connection to community resources or outpatient treatments.
Why is this work important?
Suicide is completely preventable. The deep wounds and traumas from suicide can scar families for generations, and the pain extends so much further than just the individual suffering from suicidal ideations. For these individuals, in the darkest moments, it can feel like there is no other way out. But there is support, and there is healing, and there are many people that care and want to help these individuals into a healthier and brighter future.
How can you get involved? As part of the grant, Community Bridges Inc. leads coordination and delivery of evidence-based training including ASIST (Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training) and SafeTALK (Suicide Alertness for Everyone: Tell, Ask, Listen, and KeepSafe) to agencies in Pima County.
These courses have a preventative focus with the goal of preparing trainees to more adequately, respond to and support someone with suicidal ideations, and to prevent suicide. Courses like SafeTALK and ASIST are available throughout Arizona. Request training from the Arizona Department of Education (ADE) here