As Public Health Comes Under Under Threat APHA is Taking Action

Our parent organization, the American Public Health Association has been bust at work filing lawsuits and motions as part of country-wide litigation and action challenging some of the biggest threats to public health, including:

Read the latest testimony, comments and briefs and read all public letters to congress and federal agencies from APHA.

AzPHA is gathering and sharing information through Public Health Newswire. Both APHA and AZPHA are making the voice of public heath heard in the media.

We’ve announced the For Our Health initiative with leading experts and former high-ranking officials to provide a unified voice defending evidence-based health initiatives and safeguarding critical public health protections.

APHA is are actively fighting through the courts to protect public health.

Join APHA’s advocacy efforts and urge your members of Congress to oppose the Trump administration’s efforts to cut our nation’s public health workforce.

Want to Move Beyond Individual Patient Care to Drive System-level Change? 

Join the Vot-ER Civic Health Fellowship’s 2025 cohort and master the art of community organizing alongside fellow healthcare professionals. Over eight impactful months (April-November), you’ll learn from renowned experts, develop essential leadership skills, and spearhead nonpartisan initiatives that bridge healthcare and civic engagement.

Their program structure – just 5-10 hours monthly with bimonthly virtual sessions – is designed to accommodate your demanding schedule while maximizing your learning and impact.

Applications welcome from all healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, social workers, students, and administrators. Priority deadline March 16th, final deadline March 31st. Apply at: https://vot-er.org/fellowship/

The Looming Public Health Crisis: Why Cutting Federal Funds Would Wreck Arizona’s Public Health System

Imagine waking up to a world where your local health department can’t track a measles outbreak, run immunization programs, or respond to foodborne illness outbreaks. That might not be a dream. It could shortly become a reality.

Shortly after Trump’s inauguration, his administration tried to cancel federal contracts and cooperative agreements with state and county health departments. A judge stepped in to block the move, but if that ruling is lifted—or if federal officials simply ignore it—it would be catastrophic for Arizona.

Why? Because more than 70% of county health department funding in Arizona comes from federal dollars.

Without it, the state would essentially have no functioning public health system. County health departments could still inspect restaurants (since that’s fee-based), but everything else—from infectious disease control to maternal health programs—would grind to a halt.

Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Disaster Waiting to Happen

With no public health infrastructure, Arizona wouldn’t be able to track or respond to disease outbreaks like the recent measles cases in Texas and New Mexico. Surveillance for emerging threats like new COVID-19 variants? Gone. Efforts to contain tuberculosis? Over. Vector-borne diseases like West Nile virus and dengue? No one would be monitoring them.

Immunizations for Kids & Adults Would Collapse

Public health departments run vital immunization programs that protect children and adults from vaccine-preventable diseases. Slashing federal funds would mean fewer vaccines for low-income families, leading to outbreaks of diseases we thought were under control—like measles and whooping cough.

Foodborne & Vector-Borne Illnesses: Who’s Watching?

Public health officials investigate outbreaks of foodborne illnesses like salmonella and E. coli to keep the food supply safe. Without funding, those investigations stop, leaving the public (you) at risk. Similarly, Arizona’s fight against mosquito-borne diseases like West Nile virus would be gone, increasing the chances of widespread infections.

Maternal & Child Health Programs Would Disappear

Prenatal care programs, newborn screenings, and early childhood health initiatives rely heavily on federal funding. Without them, maternal and infant mortality rates could rise, reversing decades of progress.

No Emergency Preparedness for Pandemics, Heatwaves, or Bioterrorism

Public health emergencies—whether it’s a pandemic, extreme heat, or a bioterrorism threat—require coordinated responses. County health departments lead these efforts, ensuring Arizona can react quickly and effectively. If federal funds vanish, so does preparedness, putting millions at risk.

The Bottom Line

This isn’t an exaggeration—if these cuts happen, Arizona’s public health system would collapse. The consequences would be deadly. Public health funding isn’t just another budget line item—it’s what keeps our communities safe. Cutting it would be reckless, dangerous, and utterly disastrous.

Legislative Update: March 2, 2025

The deadline for bills to be heard in assigned committees in their house of origin is long past so all the bills that did not get a committee hearing are now dead (although there are resurrection pathways).

This week was dominated by floor votes (called 3rd Read). Bills that successfully get approved on the floor votes then move over to the other chamber. Here’s a list of the public health related bills that have advanced out of their chamber this week:

Senate

  • SB1019 photo enforcement; traffic (AzPHA opposes)
  • SB1071 SNAP TANF verification (AzPHA Opposed)
  • SB1108 international medical licenses; provisional licensing (no AZPHA Position)
  • SB1612 RFP document retention; AHCCCS (No Position)

House

  • HB2001 behavioral health temporary licenses (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2012 emergency use products; employers (AzPHA Opposed)
  • HB2130 claims; prior authorization (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2058 immunization proof; higher ed (AzPHA Opposed)
  • HB2063 parental notification; immunizations (AzPHA Opposes)
  • HB2125 insurance coverage; hearing aids (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2126 medical records; parental choice (AzPHA Opposes)
  • HB2145 registered sanitarians; qualifications (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2164 school lunches; ultra processed food (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2165 SNAP; prohibited purchases (AzPHA No Position)
  • HB2175 claims; prior auth; company conduct (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2176 training; investigations; complaints (AzPHA Neutral)
  • HB2257 DCS, vaccination; child placement (AzPHA No Position)
  • HB2291 opioids, red cap packaging (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2449 AHCCCS presumptive eligibility (AzPHA Opposed)

House Passes Budget Bill with Big Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Medicaid & SNAP Likely on the Chopping Block

This week the U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed a budget bill that extends and expands the massive tax cuts for wealthy individuals first implemented in 2017. At the same time, the bill mandates $880 billion in spending cuts over the next decade.

While the legislation does not specify which programs will be cut, it assigns the House Energy & Commerce Committee the task of deciding where the axe will fall.

The House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee oversees Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program, Medicare Part B & Part D, Public Health Programs (including the CDC, NIH, and HRSA), the FDA and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

One thing is clear: Medicare is off the table. That leaves programs like Medicaid (AHCCCS) and the SNAP as the most likely targets for the committee. If history is any guide, House leadership will fall back on a familiar strategy—forcing states to cover a greater share of Medicaid expansion costs.

For Arizona, that would be bad. As outlined in our recent Arizona Public Health Association blog post, shifting more of the Medicaid costs to the states will result in Arizona’s Republican-controlled legislature refusing to pick up the tab.

That would mean the end of Medicaid coverage for 550,000 Arizonans, including low-income childless adults and people earning between 100% and 138% of the federal poverty level.

Interestingly, the parts of the state that voted for Mr. Trump by the widest margins are in the very areas that stand to lose the most if these cuts happen. Thirty-six percent of working-age Arizona adults who live in rural Arizona are covered by Medicaid versus 17% who live in urban areas (according to data from Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families).

The House has acted, but the Senate has yet to vote on a budget plan. That means there’s still time for advocacy. If these cuts move forward, Arizona—and states across the country—will see big (and bad) consequences for public health.

Stay tuned.