EPA to Tribes: ‘No Solar for You!’

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin ended the federal Solar for All program last week.

The $7B initiative (funded under the Inflation Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund) had been designed to bring rooftop and community solar to low and middle-income households, with a Tribal focus. Zeldin’s action is a $156M loss for AZ tribes.

The funding that had already been awarded will now be revoked, including $25M for the Hopi Utilities Corporation to install solar panels across the Hopi Tribe, $62M to expand access for Tribal nations statewide, and seed projects like Arizona’s first green bank, rural solar-plus-storage systems, and even solar/down-payment assistance for new homebuyers.

The impact is especially painful for Arizona’s Tribal communities, which were on track to gain some energy sovereignty, reduce dependence on outside utilities, and keep more economic activity within their own communities.

Like so many other actions by this administration – Zeldin’s decision will likely be challenged in court. For now, clean, affordable energy for Arizona’s most underserved communities is on hold and contracts canceled.

This Week’s Vote Proves Arizonans Chose a Pro-Carbon Corporation Commission

This week, the Arizona Corporation Commission voted to start the process of repealing the state’s Renewable Energy Standard and Tariff Rules, known as the “REST rules.”

Those rules were put in place back in 2006. They required big utilities to get 15% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2025. Part of that had to come from small-scale sources like rooftop solar on homes and businesses.

The all-Republican ACC said the rules aren’t needed anymore because monopoly utility companies already have their own clean energy plans.

That claim is false. Last week APS announced it’s ditching all its clean energy goals including the pledge to get 45% of its power from renewables by 2030. At least APS’s CEO admitted their earlier ‘goals’ were never really goals at all – just ‘aspirations’.

APS Abandons Clean Energy Goals & While Demanding Yet Another Rate Hike

The rulemaking change will likely take months, but it’s clear the ACC staff will eventually get their REST repeal.

None of this should surprise anyone. Voters put commissioners in office who openly favor fossil fuels over clean energy. This week’s vote is just the latest sign of what happens when pro-carbon politicians run the agency in charge of regulating Arizona’s monopoly utilities.

Note: Because the ACC’s REST repeal rulemaking relates to their constitutional authority to regulate monopoly utilities they’re exempt from Governor’s Regulatory Review Council review, meaning the repeal is a done deal and GRRC won’t be able to stop the repeal.

When the ACC proposes rules related to statutory authority given to them by the Legislature, they are subject to GRRC – but the REST rulemaking will be under their constitutional authority.

AZPHA’s Letter to the Docket Urging the ACC to Keep Renewable Energy Standards

August 13, 2025

Kevin Thompson, Chair
Nick Myers, Vice Chair
René Lopez
Lea Marquez Peterson
Rachel Walden

Arizona Corporation Commission
1300 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007

Re: Leave the Renewable Energy Standard and Tariff Rules
Docket RE-00000A-24-0026

Dear Commissioners,

The Arizona Public Health Association urges you to reject the proposal to repeal the Renewable Energy Standard and Tariff Rules (“REST Rules”). Repeal would raise power bills, weaken grid reliability, and threaten one of Arizona’s most vibrant job-creating industries.

Since 2006, the REST Rules have ensured that utilities steadily increase clean energy use 15% by 2025, with 30% from distributed sources like rooftop solar.

APS has already abandoned its voluntary goal of 45% renewable power by 2030. Without enforceable rules, Arizona risks losing investment and jobs to other states. More dependence on fossil fuels means more exposure to price spikes and supply disruptions.

The Commission’s duty is to ensure rates are just, reasonable, and supported by evidence. The evidence here is clear: the REST Rules protect ratepayers, support economic growth, and safeguard public health.

Repealing the REST Rules would raise power bills for Arizona families and businesses, undermine the reliability of our electric grid, and jeopardize a vibrant renewable energy industry that supports tens of thousands of jobs and generates tens of millions of dollars in tax revenue annually.

Adopted in 2006, the REST Rules were groundbreaking: they required Arizona utilities to get 15% of their electricity from renewable resources by 2025, with 30% from distributed energy sources like customer-owned rooftop solar. The Commission recognized that enforceable rules—not voluntary pledges—were necessary to drive investment, innovation, and cost reductions.

That vision has been realized. Since the REST Rules took effect, the cost of utility-scale solar has dropped 84% and wind costs have declined 55%. Both are now cheaper to build than new natural gas, coal, or nuclear plants.

Renewables protect ratepayers from volatile natural gas prices. Arizona’s abundant sunshine has made us the fifth-largest solar-producing state, and distributed solar reduces the need for costly peak-hour energy imports.

The economic benefits are equally compelling. Renewable energy now accounts for nearly half of Arizona’s power sector jobs. In 2023 alone, the solar industry generated over $155 million in state, county, and local tax revenues. Rural and urban communities benefit from renewable energy investments, which ripple through the state’s economy in construction, manufacturing, operations, and maintenance.

The rationale for repeal, reducing compliance and administrative costs, is dwarfed by the economic, environmental, and public health benefits of maintaining the REST Rules. Moreover, APS’ decision this week demonstrates that utilities won’t keep voluntary renewable commitments.

The Commission’s ratemaking authority carries the responsibility to ensure rates are just, reasonable, and supported by substantial evidence. Stripping away the REST Rules would expose ratepayers to unnecessary price volatility and undercut the long-term stability of our energy system.

We urge you to update, but not repeal, the REST Rules, ensuring they’ll continue to deliver affordable, dependable, clean energy for millions of Arizonans while sustaining a thriving industry that benefits our economy and public health.

Sincerely,

Will Humble, MPH

Executive Director

Arizona Public Health Association

AZ Grant Opportunities Compiled by the Vitalyst Health Foundation

APS Abandons Clean Energy & Demands Yet Another Rate Hike

In a move that should surprise nobody, APS officially abandoned their previously (superficially) touted 2030 clean energy target.

What was once framed by APS as a commitment to 65% carbon-free energy by 2030 is now framed as merely “aspirational.” In other words, they were never serious.

At least APS CEO Jeff Guldner honestly admitted that their earlier statements were just that – statements – not strategic or serious.

APS also now plans to continue buying power from the coal-fired Four Corners Power Plant through at least 2038 (8 years past what they previously said).

How Arizona’s Data Center Boom Could Hike Your Power Bill & Harm Public Health – AZ Public Health Association

With a more fossil-fuel-friendly (and industry captured) Arizona Corporation Commission in place, APS sees little risk in abandoning their earlier rhetoric around clean energy.

They even signed a contract with a new interstate methane pipeline – doubling down on methane, showing their true colors – that their strategic plan rests on fossil fuels, not renewables.

Meanwhile, APS continues to demand higher rates from its customers. Just two years after getting an 8% increase from the Corporation Commission, they now want another 14% hike.

They’ll get it.

While other utilities are investing in storage, renewables, and grid modernization, APS is doubling down on coal, gas, and customer rate hikes.

Sadly, APS and the captured AZ Corporation Commission are fine with doubling down on carbon sources while making ratepayers foot the bill rather than Pinnace West investors.

Votes for Corporation Commissioners really matter.

Senate Committee Pushes Back Against Public Health Cuts in FY26 Spending Bill

Finally, some not so bad news from Congress.

The Senate Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Committee voted 26-3 last week to advance its version of the appropriations bill for the public health and health care agencies, and it’s not all bad.

The Committee ignored Kennedy’s request to made huge cuts to many of the HHS agencies (a 42% cut to CDC and a 40% cut to NIH). Instead, the Committee bill protected some key funding for public health infrastructure:

  • Continued support for CDC programs focused on chronic disease, injury prevention (including firearm mortality research), global health, immunization, and infectious disease.
  • Preservation of the Office on Smoking and Health, an important source of prevention and education work.
  • Requires Kennedy to send a detailed plan and justification before reorganizing or transferring CDC functions.

The bill includes new accountability measures for the Payment Management System (PMS) and requires Kennedy to brief Congress on technical improvements and to notify the Committee any significant delays or outages.

Note: PMS is HHS’ system for disbursing and tracking grant payments to recipients, like universities, nonprofits, and state or local governments.

The House is currently in recess but is expected to begin marking up its LHHS bill in September.

The full committee summary is available for review.

The bill includes a total of $9.1B for CDC, a $70M (-$0.7%) cut compared to FY25:

  • $350M, or level funding for public health infrastructure and capacity.
  • $160M a decrease of $15M, for data modernization.
  • $735M (level funding) for public health emergency preparedness cooperative agreement.
  • $160M (level funding) for the Preventive Health and Health Services block grant.
  • $309M (an increase of $4M) for Health Care Readiness and Recovery (formerly the Hospital Preparedness Program).
  • $1B for the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.
  • $79M for the National Disaster Medical System.
  • $373M for the HRSA rural health programs.
  • $5M for CDC’s Office of Rural Health.
  • $534M for the SAMHSA’s suicide prevention Lifeline, 9-8-8.
  • $385M for Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics.
  • $2.2B for the National Institute of Mental Health.
  • $1B for the Mental Health Block Grant.
  • $180M for school-based mental health grants at the Dept of Education.

Kennedy Ends Federal mRNA Vaccine Research… but Work Will Continue in Europe & China

This week Kennedy canceled 22 federally funded mRNA vaccine development projects, totaling nearly $500M. His decision will stop research through the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), including projects aimed at vaccines for COVID‑19, influenza, and H5N1 bird flu.

I’ll spare you his made-up reasons for canceling the research.

His decision to eliminate federally funded mRNA vaccine research will slow down and possibly stop research to develop faster, more adaptable mRNA-based influenza vaccines, which hold the potential to be updated more rapidly and accurately in response to emerging flu strains (unlike traditional vaccines which rely on months-long egg-based production).

Kennedy is stopping the clinical trials, delaying technological refinement, and reducing the pace at which mRNA flu vaccines can be brought to market.

Editorial Note: By ending publicly funded mRNA research for infectious diseases, Kennedy is surrendering leadership in this critical biotech field to global competitors. The EU & China are heavily investing in mRNA platforms for pandemic preparedness and seasonal illness, positioning themselves to dominate future vaccine innovation and production.

In essence, Kennedy’s decision risks long-term U.S. dependence on foreign technologies and undermines America’s ability to lead in global health security.

Kennedy hasn’t canceled mRNA research for cancer immunotherapy and personalized therapeutics yet. Promising therapies in those areas stay intact at the NIH with over 120 mRNA cancer therapy clinical trials underway ($656M) including Phase 3 mRNA‑4157 studies for multiple kinds of cancers.

For example, Moderna’s melanoma vaccine and BioNTech’s personalized ‘neoantigen’ cancer therapies continue to show enormous promise for curing certain kinds of cancer including pancreatic and skin cancers… an example of the kinds of cancer trials he hasn’t canceled (yet).

Kennedy’s decision to redirect infectious disease vaccine research away from mRNA approaches will slow some progress, but it won’t end mRNA-based medicine. Private investment and biotech industry leadership as well as the EU and China recognize the promise this new technology and many U.S. companies will continue research in these areas on their own.

So much for Making America Healthy Again.

Public Health & Housing Summit

Join ADHS for their Public Health & Housing two day Virtual Summit. Participation in both sessions is strongly encouraged.

  • Part 1: Wednesday, August 20 | 10:30am – 12:30pm
  • Part 2: Thursday, August 21 | 10:30am – 12:30pm

Public Health & Housing Summit Registration

Who should attend: Leaders from housing agencies, behavioral health and substance use treatment providers, community organizations, peer support, public health, and state agencies working to address housing instability and substance use.

Registration Link: Click here to register