Do You Need a Measles Booster?

The real key to preventing measles outbreaks and epidemics is to have good vaccination rates – especially among kids. Sadly, Arizona has among the lowest childhood vaccination rates in the US – meaning that we’re primed for the kind of measles outbreak that’s currently underway in Texas and New Mexico.

Many things need to change in order to improve our rates – some are policy changes (eliminating the personal exemption) and some are operational (building back the thin network of Vaccines for Children network).

New CDC Report: Arizona Has Among the Lowest Childhood Immunization Rates in the U.S.

In the mean-time, a few folks (older adults) have asked me over the last week whether they should get a measles booster shot before the outbreak makes it to Arizona.

Good question. Why? Depending on when you were born, you may have had the disease and are protected, you may have had the old, less effective vaccine, or you may have only had one dose.

The measles vaccine (MMR) became widely available in 1963, and the highly effective two-dose schedule became standard in 1989.

Here’s what you need to know based on your age and vaccination history:

  • Born before 1957 (About 67 or older): Most people in this group likely had measles as a kid and have natural immunity (like me). If you didn’t have the disease, chances are you were vaccinated at a school vaccine clinic – remember those nurses in the cafeteria with things that looked like power drills, and the kids walked the vaccine ‘gauntlet’? I sure do.  
    • Bottom line: If you’re over 67 and didn’t have the disease as a kid you should get a booster.
  • Born between 1957 – 1967: You may have had measles or got a single-dose vaccine. The early measles vaccines (the ones used before 1968) were not as effective as the ones that came after ‘68. If you’re in this group and haven’t had a second dose, getting a booster is a good idea.
    • Bottom line: If you’re between 57 and 67 and didn’t have the disease you should get the booster.
  • Born between 1968 – 1989: If you’re in this age group, chances are you only got one measles vaccine as a child. We later learned that you really need two doses for full protection, and the two-dose schedule wasn’t introduced until 1989.
    • Bottom line: If you’re between 36 and 57 years old and haven’t had a second dose, getting a booster is a good idea.
  • Born in 1990 or later: If you’re in this age group and your parents/guardians followed the vaccine schedule (two doses, usually at ages 1 and 4) you’re good.
    • Bottom line: If you’re less than 36 years old and your parents or guardians followed the vaccine recommendations, you’re good to go. If they didn’t – complete the two-dose series before measles makes it here.

If you’re unsure of your vaccination history, your doctor can order a simple blood test to check your immunity, but to be honest – it’s probably best to just go ahead and get the booster rather than a blood draw and titer test.

The measles vaccine is widely available at pharmacies, clinics and the like. But – it’s a good idea to call and check first to make sure the pharmacy has them in stock.

As Public Health Comes Under Under Threat APHA is Taking Action

Our parent organization, the American Public Health Association has been bust at work filing lawsuits and motions as part of country-wide litigation and action challenging some of the biggest threats to public health, including:

Read the latest testimony, comments and briefs and read all public letters to congress and federal agencies from APHA.

AzPHA is gathering and sharing information through Public Health Newswire. Both APHA and AZPHA are making the voice of public heath heard in the media.

We’ve announced the For Our Health initiative with leading experts and former high-ranking officials to provide a unified voice defending evidence-based health initiatives and safeguarding critical public health protections.

APHA is are actively fighting through the courts to protect public health.

Join APHA’s advocacy efforts and urge your members of Congress to oppose the Trump administration’s efforts to cut our nation’s public health workforce.

Want to Move Beyond Individual Patient Care to Drive System-level Change? 

Join the Vot-ER Civic Health Fellowship’s 2025 cohort and master the art of community organizing alongside fellow healthcare professionals. Over eight impactful months (April-November), you’ll learn from renowned experts, develop essential leadership skills, and spearhead nonpartisan initiatives that bridge healthcare and civic engagement.

Their program structure – just 5-10 hours monthly with bimonthly virtual sessions – is designed to accommodate your demanding schedule while maximizing your learning and impact.

Applications welcome from all healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, social workers, students, and administrators. Priority deadline March 16th, final deadline March 31st. Apply at: https://vot-er.org/fellowship/

The Looming Public Health Crisis: Why Cutting Federal Funds Would Wreck Arizona’s Public Health System

Imagine waking up to a world where your local health department can’t track a measles outbreak, run immunization programs, or respond to foodborne illness outbreaks. That might not be a dream. It could shortly become a reality.

Shortly after Trump’s inauguration, his administration tried to cancel federal contracts and cooperative agreements with state and county health departments. A judge stepped in to block the move, but if that ruling is lifted—or if federal officials simply ignore it—it would be catastrophic for Arizona.

Why? Because more than 70% of county health department funding in Arizona comes from federal dollars.

Without it, the state would essentially have no functioning public health system. County health departments could still inspect restaurants (since that’s fee-based), but everything else—from infectious disease control to maternal health programs—would grind to a halt.

Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Disaster Waiting to Happen

With no public health infrastructure, Arizona wouldn’t be able to track or respond to disease outbreaks like the recent measles cases in Texas and New Mexico. Surveillance for emerging threats like new COVID-19 variants? Gone. Efforts to contain tuberculosis? Over. Vector-borne diseases like West Nile virus and dengue? No one would be monitoring them.

Immunizations for Kids & Adults Would Collapse

Public health departments run vital immunization programs that protect children and adults from vaccine-preventable diseases. Slashing federal funds would mean fewer vaccines for low-income families, leading to outbreaks of diseases we thought were under control—like measles and whooping cough.

Foodborne & Vector-Borne Illnesses: Who’s Watching?

Public health officials investigate outbreaks of foodborne illnesses like salmonella and E. coli to keep the food supply safe. Without funding, those investigations stop, leaving the public (you) at risk. Similarly, Arizona’s fight against mosquito-borne diseases like West Nile virus would be gone, increasing the chances of widespread infections.

Maternal & Child Health Programs Would Disappear

Prenatal care programs, newborn screenings, and early childhood health initiatives rely heavily on federal funding. Without them, maternal and infant mortality rates could rise, reversing decades of progress.

No Emergency Preparedness for Pandemics, Heatwaves, or Bioterrorism

Public health emergencies—whether it’s a pandemic, extreme heat, or a bioterrorism threat—require coordinated responses. County health departments lead these efforts, ensuring Arizona can react quickly and effectively. If federal funds vanish, so does preparedness, putting millions at risk.

The Bottom Line

This isn’t an exaggeration—if these cuts happen, Arizona’s public health system would collapse. The consequences would be deadly. Public health funding isn’t just another budget line item—it’s what keeps our communities safe. Cutting it would be reckless, dangerous, and utterly disastrous.

Legislative Update: March 2, 2025

The deadline for bills to be heard in assigned committees in their house of origin is long past so all the bills that did not get a committee hearing are now dead (although there are resurrection pathways).

This week was dominated by floor votes (called 3rd Read). Bills that successfully get approved on the floor votes then move over to the other chamber. Here’s a list of the public health related bills that have advanced out of their chamber this week:

Senate

  • SB1019 photo enforcement; traffic (AzPHA opposes)
  • SB1071 SNAP TANF verification (AzPHA Opposed)
  • SB1108 international medical licenses; provisional licensing (no AZPHA Position)
  • SB1612 RFP document retention; AHCCCS (No Position)

House

  • HB2001 behavioral health temporary licenses (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2012 emergency use products; employers (AzPHA Opposed)
  • HB2130 claims; prior authorization (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2058 immunization proof; higher ed (AzPHA Opposed)
  • HB2063 parental notification; immunizations (AzPHA Opposes)
  • HB2125 insurance coverage; hearing aids (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2126 medical records; parental choice (AzPHA Opposes)
  • HB2145 registered sanitarians; qualifications (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2164 school lunches; ultra processed food (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2165 SNAP; prohibited purchases (AzPHA No Position)
  • HB2175 claims; prior auth; company conduct (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2176 training; investigations; complaints (AzPHA Neutral)
  • HB2257 DCS, vaccination; child placement (AzPHA No Position)
  • HB2291 opioids, red cap packaging (AzPHA Supports)
  • HB2449 AHCCCS presumptive eligibility (AzPHA Opposed)

House Passes Budget Bill with Big Tax Cuts for the Wealthy: Medicaid & SNAP Likely on the Chopping Block

This week the U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed a budget bill that extends and expands the massive tax cuts for wealthy individuals first implemented in 2017. At the same time, the bill mandates $880 billion in spending cuts over the next decade.

While the legislation does not specify which programs will be cut, it assigns the House Energy & Commerce Committee the task of deciding where the axe will fall.

The House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee oversees Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Program, Medicare Part B & Part D, Public Health Programs (including the CDC, NIH, and HRSA), the FDA and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

One thing is clear: Medicare is off the table. That leaves programs like Medicaid (AHCCCS) and the SNAP as the most likely targets for the committee. If history is any guide, House leadership will fall back on a familiar strategy—forcing states to cover a greater share of Medicaid expansion costs.

For Arizona, that would be bad. As outlined in our recent Arizona Public Health Association blog post, shifting more of the Medicaid costs to the states will result in Arizona’s Republican-controlled legislature refusing to pick up the tab.

That would mean the end of Medicaid coverage for 550,000 Arizonans, including low-income childless adults and people earning between 100% and 138% of the federal poverty level.

Interestingly, the parts of the state that voted for Mr. Trump by the widest margins are in the very areas that stand to lose the most if these cuts happen. Thirty-six percent of working-age Arizona adults who live in rural Arizona are covered by Medicaid versus 17% who live in urban areas (according to data from Georgetown University’s Center for Children and Families).

The House has acted, but the Senate has yet to vote on a budget plan. That means there’s still time for advocacy. If these cuts move forward, Arizona—and states across the country—will see big (and bad) consequences for public health.

Stay tuned.

Measles Outbreaks & Wildfires: The Importance of Early Intervention

Measles outbreaks are like wildfires: both get out of control fast if they’re not immediately detected and managed. The surge of measles cases across nine counties in Texas (originating from a single first case in a community with low vaccination rates) highlights the critical need for immediate detection of early case(s) and immediate and effective interventions.

Public health has several tools that can help stop a measles outbreak once – but only if they all work in tandem and happen fast.  The core control measures are:

  1. Robust Surveillance and Early Detection: The first case of measles needs to be found right away. Having relationships with front line clinicians and laboratories are key to finding that critical first case. Healthcare providers need to recognize early symptoms and quickly report suspected cases to the county health department.
  2. Immediate Contact Tracing: Once a case is confirmed, county epidemiologists need to quickly do contact tracing to find everyone who may have been exposed – with a focus on unvaccinated contacts – especially in school settings. Having immediate access to the vaccination status of the kids in a school or preschool is key to knowing which contacts are unvaccinated.
  3. Exclusion of Unvaccinated Contacts: County health officers need to exclude unvaccinated student contacts from in-person schooling for two incubation periods (approximately 42 days) to curb potential spread within schools and day cares.  County staff also need to ensure good isolation of exposed unvaccinated contacts from unvaccinated people (including family members). As kids under 1 year old are all unvaccinated – health officials need ensure infants don’t have contact with unvaccinated contacts.
  4. Accelerated Vaccination Campaigns: Counties also need to deploy immunization teams to administer the MMR vaccine to unvaccinated contacts (and hopefully newly motivated unvaccinated community members).

AzDHS Measles Control Measures

What Happens if Measles Gets into Arizona Schools or Childcare?

Many areas of Arizona are at risk of a measles epidemic running out of control because of our poor vaccination rates.

New CDC Report: Arizona Has Among the Lowest Childhood Immunization Rates in the U.S.

During the 2023-24 school year, only two counties—Santa Cruz and Yuma— had the 95% herd immunity threshold necessary to prevent measles outbreaks. The increasing number of personal belief exemptions (and the paucity of places where families can get their kids vaccinated) have significantly reduced vaccination rates, leaving communities vulnerable to outbreaks like the one in Texas.

Here’s why Arizona is at high risk for a measles outbreak

County health departments need to treat measles outbreaks with the urgency of a wildfire. Immediate detection, fast & thorough contact tracing, strategic exclusion policies, and proactive vaccination efforts are key to preventing small sparks from igniting into an uncontrollable epidemic.

Of course- public health is really all about prevention – and the most effective intervention is to have and keep high childhood immunization rates – something that will be more and more difficult in the coming years given the new leadership at HHS.

RFK Jr. as HHS Secretary? Why It Could Mean the End of Evidence-Based Public Health Policy

RFK Jr. Already Taking Actions to Undermine Immunizations

Just days into his tenure as Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is already backtracking on ‘assurance’ he gave during his Senate confirmation.

Despite pledging to uphold the integrity of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and not to interfere with childhood immunizations, Kennedy has already taken action to destabilize ACIP and evidence-based vaccine policy.

The ACIP, a panel of independent experts, is instrumental in developing vaccine recommendations in the US. These guidelines inform healthcare providers and influence insurance coverage, as most health plans must cover vaccines recommended by the ACIP. Those that aren’t on the schedule are generally not covered.

On his first day in office, Kennedy postponed a scheduled ACIP meeting set for late February. This meeting was slated to discuss critical updates on vaccines, including Gardasil, the human papillomavirus vaccine that prevents cervical cancer.

Kennedy has a history of opposing Gardasil, having represented individuals claiming injury from the vaccine and alleging that its manufacturer, Merck, overstated HPV risks to promote mass vaccinations.

Beyond canceling the meeting, reports indicate that Kennedy plans to overhaul the ACIP by removing members he perceives as having conflicts of interest.

RFK Jr. prepares shake-up of vaccine advisers – POLITICO

The ACIP’s recommendations are foundational to public health, guiding vaccine schedules that have significantly reduced the prevalence of infectious diseases. Insurance coverage for vaccines is often contingent upon these recommendations, meaning alterations could lead to decreased coverage and higher out-of-pocket costs for patients

During his confirmation, Kennedy assured senators that he would respect scientific analyses and uphold existing immunization practices. His recent actions, however, indicate a (predictable) departure from these commitments.

As these developments unfold, we will continue to raise the alarm and do what we can to educate the public about the real consequences of Mr. Kennedy’s decisions and actions.

I have no delusions that we will get him to change his mind about anything – but it will at least feel good to tell the public the truth in our small little way.