Turnover in the AZ State Legislature Upsetting the Lobbyist Apple Cart

In part, because of redistricting, there is a ton of turnover at the Arizona State Legislature coming. Thise changes will have big implications for the movers and shakers down at the Capitol because so much of lobbyist’s influence is due to relationships. With so many new faces – they’ll need to build new relationships – and a lot of them.

I started writing a piece earlier this week to explain what it all means- but then the Arizona Agenda came out with an explainer last week. There’s no way I can explain it better than Rachel Leingang & Hank Stephenson did in their piece last week…  so, I’m providing it for you here (with attribution).

If you’re not a subscriber to the Arizona Agenda I encourage you to become one. A terrific well-written and consumable email like the one below will come to your in-box every weekday morning for only $120 per year. Here’s where to subscribe: Welcome to the Arizona Agenda (substack.com)

__________

With Democrats freshly in control of nearly every statewide office and massive turnover in the Legislature, the power dynamics at the Capitol are rapidly changing.

Many of the old power brokers are on the outs, and a new class of influencers will have an opportunity to prove they can enact policy in the newly purple state. Holding the Republican caucus together is no longer the go-to play. The mandate from the Governor’s Office is a bipartisan policy agenda, and in a split government, building a coalition is key.

Sure, the Legislature is still full of MAGA warriors. Warren Petersen is leading the state Senate, and Sen. Wendy Rogers and her ilk mostly run the Legislature’s most powerful committees. But if you’re a lobbyist looking to pass bills at the Capitol next year, you’re probably not asking “Freedom Caucus” leader Rep. Jake Hoffman to sponsor them.

The Republican firebrands who have largely set the tone and direction of the state Legislature are on the outs, as are their friends in the lobbying class.

Instead, Capitol lobbyists say they’re looking at moderate Republicans and, for the first time in more than a decade, Democrats, to help push their policy priorities through the legislative process.

The same politicians who were preparing for four years on the back bench under a Kari Lake governorship are now seeing their political fortunes skyrocket. A month ago, for example, Republican Sen. T.J. Shope was blocked on Twitter by the potential next governor. Today, he’s almost universally considered one of the Capitol’s most influential leaders, several lobbyists said.

“T.J. Shope will have to run all the bills,” one lobbyist joked. 

The ranks of moderate Republicans have been decimated in recent years. But we may for the first time see the “moderate caucus” grow, or at least see an increasing number of Republican lawmakers crossing the aisle to work with Democrats to pass shared priorities out of necessity or self-preservation. 

Keep an eye on Republican lawmakers from swing districts¹, like Reps. Justin Wilmeth and Matt Gress, and Sens. Steve Kaiser, Shope and J.D. Mesnard. Political insiders also point to a handful of Republicans with independent streaks, like Reps. Ken Bennett and David Cook and Sen. Sine Kerr, or a willingness to cut deals, like Sen. David Gowan, as the type that will thrive in a divided government.   

And legislative Democrats, with their former colleague now on the Ninth Floor, are a more powerful force than they have been in more than a decade. While individual Democrats are sure to shine under a Democratic governorship, the Democratic leaders in both caucuses will now wield nearly as much power as their Republican counterparts. Senate Democratic Leader Raquel Terán and House Democratic Leader Andrés Cano, working with the Governor’s Office, will likely drive the state budget process, for example, not Republicans. 

But it’s not just the politicians whose influences are waxing or waning. The lobbying class will change as well. While many of the old-timers were savvy enough to not make personal enemies with either candidate, others put all their eggs in the Lake basket.

Those in the lobbying and consulting corps who offered their full-throated backing of losing America First candidates could see their fortunes flop, like their candidates. Lobbyists like Spencer Kamps of the Homebuilders’ Association of Central Arizona, Bas Aja of the Cattlemen’s Association, Danny Seiden of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Patrick Bray of the Arizona Farm and Ranch Group were all major Lake supporters who were rumored to be among possible picks for her administration.

Instead, the political power center of Arizona is now built around centrist Democrats like lobbyist Mike Haener, the co-chair of her transition team who has been a staple in state government and policy since the Janet Napolitano administration; Chad Campbell of Strategies 360, a former lawmaker and longtime Hobbs friend and ally; and Joe Wolf, Hobbs’ top campaign adviser, as well as a few Republicans who stuck by Hobbs through the campaign.

Perhaps the biggest question is where Arizona’s progressive infrastructure fits into the Hobbs machine. What kind of influence groups like LUCHA, Progress Arizona and unions that supported Hobbs will have on the governor’s agenda, and will they ultimately work as friend or foe to her generally center-left administration? On that front, one lobbyist warned that while progressives will certainly have their best opportunity for wins in years, similar to far-right Republicans, progressives focused on controversial issues should stay sober about what’s possible, even under a Democratic governor.

Governor-elect Hobbs Begins to Hire Executive Staff

Last Friday Governor-Elect Katie Hobbs announced who will be filling senior posts in her upcoming administration. A couple of weeks ago she named Allie Bones as her Chief of Staff. Here are some of the folks that will be on the 9th floor 22 days from now (source: Governor-Elect Katie Hobbs Announces Key Senior Roles In Administration)

Tracy Lopes – Director of Policy Tracy Lopes | LinkedIn
Tracy Lopes received her law degree from the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth. After graduating law school, she spent many years as an Assistant District Attorney, mainly in the Abuse Crimes Unit.

While on a leave of absence, she was a Legal Intern for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. While there, she was awarded a Certificate in International Humanitarian Rights by the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Tracy has been a Law Professor and was an Administrative Law Judge with the Department of Economic Security. She received her MS in Forensic Psychology from Arizona State University and is currently working on her MSW degree from the same.

Most recently, Ms. Lopes has served as the Chief of Staff for the Democratic Caucus of the Arizona House of Representatives. In that role she became very familiar with public health policy. We expect Tracy to be a friend of public health in the incoming administration.

Will Gaona – Director of Public Affairs Will Gaona | LinkedIn
Will Gaona served as the legislative affairs director for the Arizona Secretary of State from 2019-2022. He has previously worked in municipal government and the nonprofit sector, including stints at Protect Democracy, the ACLU of Arizona, and the Arizona Coalition to End Sexual and Domestic Violence. Will graduated from the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law in 2012 and from the University of Arizona in 2009.

Ben Henderson – Director of Operations Ben Henderson | LinkedIn
Ben Henderson is a public servant and technocrat who has spent his career helping the government use data, technology, and continuous improvement to be a force for good. He has served as Director of Operations as well as Deputy Budget Director for Colorado Governor Polis, Chief Operating Officer for the AZ Department of Education under Superintendent Hoffman, and in Economic Development for the City of Phoenix.

Murphy Hebert – Director of Communications Murphy Hebert / Twitter
C. Murphy Hebert has made Arizona her home for nearly 30 years. Most recently, she served as the communications director in the Office of the Secretary of State, prior to that she worked at the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office and the Arizona State Legislature. She is a proud Sun Devil, who graduated from ASU with a bachelor’s degree in Journalism. She also earned a master’s degree in Political Science from American University.

Sarah Brown – Office of Strategic Planning & Budgeting Director
S
arah Brown currently serves as Chief Financial Officer and Human Resources Director at the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office, where she has worked since February 2019.

Before joining the Secretary of State’s Office, she worked in the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office from 2013-2019 and, prior to that, in corporate finance. Sarah holds a bachelor’s degree in accounting, a certificate in diversity and inclusion, and is the chair of the Bring Change to Mind Arizona Council of Advisors.

Ariel Morin – Diversity Equity & Inclusion Director
Ariel Morin has worked for the State of Arizona for 11+ years, serving in positions at DES, DLLC, ADOA, and most recently as the HR Manager with the Secretary of State. Her primary focus is on HR principles, AMS, and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).

She possesses certifications in DEI and Conflict Management. Born and raised in Maryvale, Ariel’s love for her community inspired her to pursue her education in Public Administration and Intercultural Communication.

AzPHA Annual Members Meeting: January 11, 2023

Wednesday, January 11, 11:00am – 1:00pm (Zoom)
Register Here

Agenda

  • Welcome & Introductions
  • Approval of 2021 Business Meeting Minutes
  • Treasurer’s Report
  • Public Health Policy Committee Report
  • Professional Development Committee Report
  • Membership Committee Report
  • Community Health Justice Committee Report
  • Executive Director’s Report
  • Recognize Outgoing Board Members
  • Recognize New Incoming Board Members
  • Passing the Gavel & Remarks by Incoming President
Register Here

AzPHA Firearm Injury & Mortality Surveillance Report Coming in January: Report to Include a Policy Intervention Evidence Review

The AZPHA Board of Directors met in early 2022 for a strategic planning session. One of the outcomes from the session was to set longer term public health policy priorities for AZPHA to work on. 

Among those priorities was a focus on prevention of deaths from firearm injuries and deaths. Our workplan for that priority started with pulling together a public health surveillance report of firearm injuries and deaths in Arizona and a literature review of evidence-based interventions (no such surveillance report has been produced by ADHS during the Ducey administration – leaving an 8-year gap in surveillance evidence).

We expect our report to be published in mid-January. In the meantime, we will be presenting snippets from the report in these weekly policy updates.

A huge shout out to our authors for the report, Julia Jackman & Allan Williams, who have put in countless hours preparing our report!

Governors & State Agency Culture

The Governor is just one person. There are 32,000 people working in various capacities in state government. So how is it that just one person, the governor, can impact the work culture and morale of 32,000 employees? It’s all about leverage.

The governor is the most powerful person in the state. She or he has enormous statutory authority and can hire or fire just about any state employee (virtually all state employees are ‘at will’ these days – meaning they can be fired for no reason at all).

Governors seldom reach deep down into agencies and fire and replace people…  but it’s common for governors to replace agency heads, deputies, legislative affairs people and communication directors (especially at the beginning of an administration). It’s also customary for the governor to make wholesale changes in governor’s office personnel.

So how does all that statutory authority including the authority to change agency directors and their deputies change the work culture of state government?

Perhaps the biggest thing is that agency directors set the tone for workplace behavior, agency priorities, flexible work schedules, whether to allow programs to hire folks, selects the deputy and assistant directors to carry out her or his wishes, gives the programs green, yellow, or red lights to apply for grants, and makes decisions about administrative rulemakings.

The decisions that the directors and her or his assistants make have a profound impact on workplace culture and morale. Add to that the kinds of executive orders the governor gives, like capping agencies at a certain FTE level or freezing changes to administrative code and you can start to see how a single person can have such a profound impact on work culture.

Agency director management style can influence culture in more subtle & insidious ways. For example, appointed directors can stifle innovation and harm morale by instructing staff to clear all decisions with them before proceeding. Even worse, appointees may tell staff to halt action until he or she “hears back from the governor’s office“…  resulting in long delays or even a complete lack of progress.

When there’s a change in the governor, as there will be in about 30 days, it’s a real opportunity for cultural change.

Many persons that work in various sectors of public health in private, nonprofit, or among other levels of government will be looking forward to potential changes in the coming work environment and may be attracted to serve in the new administration if they believe the incoming governor better appreciates the importance of evidence-based public health practice and improves morale by creating a healthier agency culture.

Many people are likely looking forward to a cultural renaissance in Arizona state agencies and will be looking forward to working with the new administration.

Some folks who might not have considered working for the ADHS over the last few years might be willing to give the agency a 2nd look in the coming months. I expect interest in (and competition for) positions at ADHS to pick up once the governor is sworn in and new leadership is selected. Why not get in on the ground floor?

On one hand, it’s a shame that there are nearly 100 open positions at ADHS these days, but on the other hand – those vacant positions represent opportunities for folks to join the new team early in the administration.

A quick review of open positions on the AZ State Jobs website reveals openings for epidemiologists, emergency medical services staff, newborn screening positions, maternal health (PRAMS) jobs, laboratory and behavioral health tech’s, a tribal liaison, several positions in licensing and compliance, vaccine coordinators, opioid prevention, biomedical research, even the agency director.

You get the idea…  there are many open positions that many of you may be interested in exploring in anticipation of the cultural changes that’ll be coming to state government in the coming months. Now is a good time to explore the possibilities.

You can start your search at this link – the AZ State Jobs Website
Submit Your Resume to the Hobbs Administration Resume Bank to be Considered for a Leadership Post in the Administration

Arizona Child Fatality Review Program: 29th Annual Report: Arizona’s Abuse/Neglect Mortality Rate Increased 36% in 2021

Back in the mid 1990’s the AZ State Legislature established the Arizona Child Fatality Review Program to evaluate every child death and provide evidence-based policy recommendations to prevent child deaths.

Over the years many policy and operational interventions came out of these reports, from safe sleep to new seat belt laws for kids. The goal of each year’s report by conducting a comprehensive review of all child deaths and make policy recommendations to prevent as many as possible.

Last year’s report found that firearm deaths increased 41% over the previous year, while child death rates were 250% higher than the national average (likely due to the lack of mitigation measures implemented by soon to be former governor Ducey and former director Christ. 

View the the Arizona Child Fatality Review Program 29th Annual Report

The Arizona Child Fatality Review Program’s goal is to reduce child deaths in Arizona by conducting a comprehensive review of all child deaths to determine what steps could have been taken, if any, to prevent each child’s death.

In 2021, 863 children died in Arizona, an increase from 838 deaths in 2020. Fourth eight percent (48%) of the 863 deaths were preventable. The three most common causes of preventable death were motor vehicle crashes, firearm injuries, and suffocation. Fifty-six (56) children died from a firearm injury (100% of these deaths were determined to be preventable).

In 43% of the preventable deaths, substance use was a contributing factor, and in 33% of these deaths, poverty was a risk factor. There were 44 suicide deaths in 2021. In 68% of these deaths, recent warning signs for suicide were the most common risk factor, and 17 suicide deaths were due to firearm injury. 

Prematurity was the most common cause of death for neonates (infants less than 28 days old) while suffocation was the common cause of death among infants 28 days to less than 1 year of age. Drowning was the most common cause of death in children 1-4 years of age as 68% of the 44 drowning deaths occurred in this age group.

There were 65 SUIDs in 2021. An unsafe sleep environment was a factor in 95% of these deaths and bedsharing in 58% of the deaths.

Arizona’s abuse/neglect mortality rate increased 36% from 5.8 in 2020 to 7.9 in 2021. Of the 128 children who died in 2021 from abuse/neglect, substance use was a contributing factor in 59% of the deaths, and the child’s families had prior involvement with a CPS agency in 46% of the deaths.

Importantly, the report proposes several evidence-based interventions that should be implemented that would reduce preventable childhood deaths. Those recommendations are laid out on Pages 90-99 of the Arizona Child Fatality Review Program | Twenty-Ninth Annual Report.

Intervention recommendations are proposed for preventing abuse & neglect, COVID-19, drowning, firearm injuries, car crashes, prematurity, substance use, SIDS, and suicide.

We expect this year’s Child Fatality Review Program report to be more influential in informing public policy as the incoming governor is more receptive to prioritizing evidence-based public health policy & practice than the outgoing administration.

Call for Presentations: AZPHA Annual Conference

Addressing Health Disparities:
Building Infrastructure & Engaging the Next Generation of Public Health Leaders

AzPHA will be holding our annual conference on Thursday, February 23, 2023 at the Desert Willow Conference Center on Phoenix, AZ. In preparation for the conference, AZPHA is conducting an open call for abstracts for persons wishing to present at the conference.

Presentations are scheduled to be held in person. A virtual option has yet to be confirmed but is being considered. Please select which format you prefer to present, and we will do our best to honor your preference based on what is available.

Depending on your selection, you may be asked to present twice. You may propose your work as a solo presenter or as a team. The breakout sessions will be 45 minutes, there will be a morning and an afternoon session.

Presenting teams: All presenters must register for the full event. Please identify the primary presenter for your team presentation. This individual will communicate conference-related information with the rest of the team.

If you are submitting this proposal as part of a team, please confirm the following before applying:

  • Proposed speakers have agreed to participate.
  • Proposed speakers will be available on Thursday, 2/23/23
  • Deadline for submission is December 23, 2022.

We look forward to reviewing your proposal for the 2023 AZPHA Annual Conference!

Please submit your proposal to present by 12/23/22 using our call for proposals form
You can also propose to present a poster at the conference. Use our poster presentation proposal form

Governor-elect Hobbs’ Transition Team Reviewing CV’s for Administration Leadership Posts: Get Your Resume in the Hopper!

The Hobbs Administration begins in just 32 days…  and the incoming administration is moving swiftly to prepare to govern. Governor-elect Katie Hobbs has named Allie Bones as her incoming Chief of Staff. Ms. Bones is a long-time public servant and has been the current assistant secretary of state under Secretary of State Hobbs since the latter took office in 2019.

Hobbs has also named the co-leads and members of her formal transition team. Monica Villalobos, president and CEO of the Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce and Mike Haener, former deputy chief of staff to Governor Janet Napolitano to be the co-leads of her 30-member formal transition team.

Submit Your Resume to the Hobbs Administration Resume Bank to be Considered for a Leadership Post in the Administration

Members of the formal transition team are below: (Note: transition team members have many professional responsibilities; I include an abbreviated description here):

  • Mike Haener Co-lead (Willetta Partners, Deputy Chief of Staff for Legislative Affairs – Gov. Napolitano)
  • Monica Villalobos Co-lead (President & CEO of the Arizona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce)
  • David Adame (President & CEO Chicanos por la Causa)
  • Jasmine Blackwater-Nygren (Member of the Arizona House of Representatives)
  • Ron Butler (Managing Partner of the Phoenix office of Ernst & Young)
  • Chris Camacho (President & CEO of the Greater Phoenix Economic Council)
  • Chad Campbell (SVP at Strategies 360 Consulting, former House Minority Leader AZ State Legislature)
  • Coral Evans (former Flagstaff Mayor & Council Member)
  • Marlene Galan-Woods (former journalist, actor, producer)
  • Steve Gallardo (Maricopa County Board of Supervisors)
  • Marisol Garcia (President, Arizona Education Association)
  • John Giles (Mayor, City of Mesa)
  • John Graham (Chairman and CEO of Sunbelt Holdings)
  • Sharon Harper (President, CEO and co-founder of Plaza Companies)
  • Martin Harvier (President, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community)
  • Berdetta Hodge (Tempe Union High School District Governing Board/ Tempe Town Council)
  • Andy Kunasek (Maricopa County Supervisor)
  • Jen Longdon (Arizona House of Representatives)
  • Garrick McFadden (Founder, Owner Gamesq, PLC)
  • Jim McLaughlin (President at UFCW Local 99)
  • Peggy Neely (former Phoenix Vice Mayor, Managing Partner at Neely Public Strategies)
  • Jackie Norton (President and CEO of the Rodel Foundation)
  • Tonya Norwood-Pearson (Arizona Association of Conservation Districts Executive Director)
  • Danny Ortega (Owner of the Ortega Law Firm, P.C.)
  • Lynne Pancrazi (former Representative and Senator, Arizona State Legislature)
  • Stephanie Parra (Governing Board, Phoenix Union HSD)
  • Frank Piccoli (AFSCME AZ Local 2960 President and People Committee Chair)
  • Regina Romero (Mayor, City of Tucson)
  • Fabian Sandez (Special Representative, United Brotherhood of Carpenters/Joiners of America)
  • Alfred Urbina (Attorney General, Pascua Yaqui Tribe)
  • Mary Rose Wilcox (former Supervisor, Maricopa County; Valleywise Health Governing Board)
  • Bob Worsley (former Senator, Arizona State Legislature)

The 30 members of the transition team are broken into various working groups, as is customary for transition teams. The most relevant teams to our public health mission will be the Health and Human Services team (AHCCCS, ADES, ADHS, ADoH, and DCS).

One consideration when selecting a person for a transition team is usually related to the diversity of their connections and relationships to state government, local sectors, nonprofits, and other stakeholders. A diverse transition team with robust contacts allows them to talk with a host of folks who are not on the transition team to get input and ideas.

What Does a Transition Team Do?

Transition teams generally have operational goals: 1) Interviewing current administration officials; 2) Making personnel recommendations; and 3) Reviewing agency briefing materials & making recommendations about state government policies & operations.

One of the first things the transition team groups do is ask for the agency’s briefing materials. As they review the quality and content of the briefing documents, they ask themselves: Is this high-quality and professionally prepared? Are the materials objective or self-serving? Do they appear to be prepared at the last minute? How useful is the information?

The transition team groups usually schedule meetings or calls with a host of stakeholders who they trust as well as existing agency directors and their assistants. Transition team members also often talk to key stakeholder groups that work or are affected by agency decisions and operations.

Making Personnel & Policy Recommendations

Over the next month or so, the transition team will be making recommendations to Governor Elect Hobbs and Chief of Staff Bones about who they have found that would be good fits for leadership positions at the state agencies.

Don’t miss the opportunity to be considered for a leadership post in an administration that’s poised to be a good working environment for folks committed to evidence-based public health practice.

Submit Your CV for Consideration Via the Hobbs Administration Resume Bank Today!

How Can State Agency Staff Prepare for their Meetings with the Gubernatorial Transition Team?

It’s a Sprint to Inauguration Day: Here’s What We Might Expect During the Transition

What Impact Will the Election Results Have on Arizona Public Health?

Free Webinar: Distinguishing Lobbying, Advocacy & Education 

 December 7th, 2022, 1-2:00pm AZ Time

In this session we will be highlighting the difference between lobbying, advocacy and education, discussing what you’re allowed to do, and how to operate within both the letter and spirit of those guidelines. We are pleased to be joined by experts on the guidelines that govern lobbying and advocacy: the ChangeLab solutions team and Allen Mattison, partner at Trister Ross.

Register in advance for this meeting. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

This session will include live transcription (the automatic zoom capability), please email Rya ([email protected]) any accommodations or considerations we should take to make sure you can fully participate. 

Arizonans Make Decisions on Ballot Measures: An Analysis from a Public Health Perspective

Arizonans approved 7 ballot measures and rejected 3 others in the recent election. Fortunately, approved the Predatory Debt Collection Protection Act and the Stop Dark Money voter initiatives by a wide margin. Voters also wisely approved Proposition 308, which will now allow for in-state and in-county tuition for certain non-citizens at Arizona’s community colleges and universities.

Importantly, voters also wisely rejected Proposition 128, which would have given the legislature more authority to change previously approved voter initiatives with a simple majority vote if a part of the initiative is later found to be unconstitutional or illegal (I was most concerned about the ‘illegal’ portion of that language as it was super-nebulous). Voters also wisely rejected Proposition 309 which would have made mail in voting more difficult and complicated.

Sadly, voters approved Proposition 132. In future elections, any proposition or voter initiative that includes a tax will require a 60% majority to be approved. This will make it much more difficult to pass future voter initiatives that require a tax funding source for implementation. 

Similarly, voters approved Proposition 129, which will require all future voter initiatives to have a single subject. 129’s passage will (in my opinion) give opponents of future voter initiatives more ammunition to knock initiatives off the ballot before voters even get a chance to vote on them.

Voters rejected Proposition 310, which would have supplied badly needed funds to rural fire districts. Because Prop 132 passed, if an alternative to Prop 310 is proposed at a future date it will need a 60% majority vote to succeed.

Note: The voting trends for proposition 310 were interesting but not surprising. Urban, suburban, and tribal voters were generally willing to pay the 0.1% statewide sales tax to subsidize rural fire and EMS districts. Voters in rural Arizona voted No on 310 by a wide margin, sinking the proposition.

Proposition 132 passed requiring future propositions that include a tax pass with at least 60% of the vote. Prop 132 was successful in large part because of strong support in rural Arizona. As a result, EMS care in Arizona fire districts will likely continue to be substandard in perpetuity because passing a future proposition that includes any kind of tax is likely unachievable.

Rural Arizona voters missed perhaps their only opportunity to infuse funding from urban and suburban voters to subsidize their fire and EMS districts. It would also take a 60-40 vote to increase the property tax cap in rural fire districts, meaning improving EMS care in AZ will be next to impossible now.

Title

Description

Result

Yes Votes

No Votes

128 Allows the Legislature to amend or repeal voter-approved ballot measures that contain provisions ruled unconstitutional or illegal by the Arizona or U.S. Supreme Court

F

859,675 (36%)

1,502,367 (64%)

129 Require citizen-initiated ballot measures to embrace a single subject

P

1,311,046 (55%)

1,062,532 (45%)

130 Allow the Legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications P

1,478,582 (64%)

840,299 (36%)

131 Create the position of lieutenant governor to be elected on a joint ticket with the governor P

1,299,483 (55%)

1,056,433 (45%)

132 Require a 60% vote to pass ballot measures to approve taxes P

1,205,099 (51%)

1,176,326 (49%)

209 Limit interest rates for debt from healthcare services and increases the value of certain property and earnings exempt from debt collection

P

1,747,362 (72%)

679,089 (28%)

211 Require that anyone making independent expenditures of more than $50K on a statewide campaign or $25K on a local campaign to disclose the names of the money’s sources P

1,736,495 (72%)

664,111 (28%)

308 Allows in-state tuition for non-citizen residents that meet specific requirements P

1,250,319 (51%)

1,189,877 (49%)

309 Require date of birth and voter identification number for mail-in ballots and end two-document alternative to photo ID for in-person voting

F

1,201,181 (50%)

1,219,668 (50%)

310 Create a 0.1% sales tax for 20 years to fund fire districts

F

1,144,494 (48%)

1,230,042 (52%)