AHCCCS Asks Permission to Implement Work Requirements & Five-Year Benefit Limit

AHCCCS just turned in their waiver request to the CMS asking permission to implement work reporting requirements and establish a five-year lifetime limit on Medicaid benefits for certain adults.

The proposal aligns with Senate Bill 1092 (enacted in 2015) which requires AHCCCS to annually ask CMS permission to implement a work requirement & 5-year lifetime benefit cap for able bodied adults.

See the Final Submitted Waiver Request

As you might expect – the real key in the waiver is the definition of who is ‘able bodied.’

AHCCCS’ proposal has a long list of categories of adults that are exempted because they’re not considered ‘able bodied.’ More on that in a bit.

Once approved by CMS (which will happen unless they think AHCCCS was too generous with excluding populations), “able-bodied adults” aged 19 to 55 would need to engage in at least 20 hours per week of qualifying activities like a job, school attendance or participation in “Employment Support and Development” programs in order to keep their Medicaid coverage.

There will also be a 5-year lifetime limit for Medicaid enrollment in AZ for “able-bodied adults”. ​

Exempt Populations:

  • People who are at least 56 years old;
  • Those who qualify for services through the Indian Health Service or Tribally-Operated Health Facilities;
  • Native Americans;
  • Women up to the end of the 12-month postpartum;
  • Former Arizona foster youth up to age 26;
  • People determined to have a serious mental illness or who have have a qualifying SMI diagnosis;
  • Those in active treatment with respect to a substance use disorder;
  • People receiving temporary or permanent long-term disability benefits from a private insurer or the government;
  • Individuals who are receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Cash Assistance, or Unemployment Insurance income benefits;
  • People who are exempt from ADES’ SNAP Work Requirement programs;
  • Individuals who are determined to be medically frail; 
  • Individuals who have an acute medical condition (physical and/or behavioral) that would prevent them from following the requirements;
  • Full-time high school students who are older than 18 years old;
  • Full-time trade school, college, or graduate students;
  • Victims of domestic violence; 
  • People taking part in AHCCCS Works;
  • Individuals who are homeless or who were recently homeless for up to six months post-housing; 
  • Individuals who have recently been directly affected by a catastrophic event such as a natural disaster; 
  • Parents, caretaker relatives, foster parents, and legal guardians, and caregivers of individuals diagnosed with SMI;
  • Caregivers of a family member who is enrolled in the Arizona Long-Term Care System (ALTCS);
  • Individuals who were incarcerated within the last six months; or
  • Veterans regardless of the discharge status.

Effective implementation will depend on AHCCCS’s ability to cross-reference databases to find exempt individuals, collaborating with agencies like ADES, Social Security etc. for data sharing.

Additionally, it’ll be super important to set up user-friendly systems for “able-bodied” members to report their work, school attendance, or ESD program participation is crucial to prevent unnecessary loss of coverage due to documentation challenges.​

I expect the work program and the 5-year benefit limit for able bodied adults to begin October 1, 2025.

See the Final Submitted Waiver Request

AHCCCS Seeks Public Input on Proposed Medicaid Work Requirements & 5-Year Lifetime Limit on Benefits – AZ Public Health Association

House Budget Resolution Threatens Big Medicaid (AHCCCS) Cuts

Last Wednesday the U.S. House of Representatives passed a Republican-led budget resolution (216–214) setting the stage for large Medicaid cuts.

While last week’s resolution doesn’t explicitly target Medicaid, it tells the House Energy & Commerce Committee to find $880B in cuts over the next decade—most of which will need to come from Medicaid because that’s basically the only place the Committee can find that level of cuts (Medicare and Social Security are supposedly off the table).

When enacted, these cuts will impact over 79M Americans who rely on Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program, including about 550,000 people in Arizona (mostly ‘childless adults’).

Most likely the way they’ll do it is by implementing a per capita funding cap and reducing the federal match rate for Medicaid expansion population to 65% from the current 90%.

Arizona is a ‘trigger state’ – so as soon as the federal contribution for ‘childless adults’ drops below 80% 550,000 Arizonans will immediately be kicked off AHCCCS.

Arizona’s Medicaid on the Brink: 550,000 May Lose AHCCCS Health Insurance Amid Federal Cuts

The resolution also allows for up to $4.5 trillion in tax cuts for rich people and raises the debt ceiling by $4 trillion.

The Senate’s version of the budget resolution differs, instructing committees to increase deficits by $5.8 trillion without clear implications for Medicaid cuts.

The two chambers now need to negotiate and come up with a compromise.

If the House resolution is also passed by the Senate and implemented, it will cause big reductions in Medicaid eligibility and kick 550,000 people off AHCCCS – disproportionately impacting rural Arizona – which incidentally voted for Mr. Trump by a wide margin.

New Fiscal Analysis: The Economic Impact of Federal Medicaid Cuts in Arizona

A National Public Health Week Call to Action: Let’s Use a Public Health Approach to Address Gun Violence

In 1964 the Surgeon General released a report titled “Smoking and Health” concluding that cigarette smoking is a major cause of lung cancer. The report was a top news story, and led to laws requiring warnings on cigarette packages and bans on advertising. Since then, additional Surgeon General reports focused on secondhand smoke and new tobacco distribution systems, such as e-cigarettes, again resulting in changes to law.

Although it took roughly half a century after the first report for public understanding to follow, smoking rates have declined by more than 50%, decreasing both lung cancer and lung cancer death rates. In addition, tobacco companies settled a lawsuit with states to recover billions of dollars in healthcare costs attributed to tobacco.

In June of last year Surgeon General Vivek Murthy declared firearm violence a public health concern. Was the 2024 Surgeon General Advisory declaring gun violence a public health problem poised to do the same thing?

In March of this year, the report disappeared from the Health and Human Services website by executive order

Gun violence takes multiple forms including suicide, homicide, domestic violence, mass shootings, and mental health effects of witnessing violence.

It’s a uniquely American problem. Overall firearm-related death rate here is over tenfold higher than 28 other high-income countries. Guns are now the leading cause of death for children under age 18, surpassing car accidents, infections, and cancer. Arizona  loses over 1,300 people a year to gun violence at rates over 40% higher than the nation

Labeling gun violence a public health problem reveals the true scope of the problem and emphasizes comprehensive, evidence-based approaches to prevention and intervention.

Public health research has found effective solutions to gun violence. These include solutions that don’t infringe on the rights of law-abiding gun owners – licensing, safe storage, and interventions to prevent access for those who pose harm.

Due to a 20-year ban on research related to gun violence that just ended in 2022, we need to improve collection and sources of gun violence data and use them to evaluate short and long-term outcomes of gun violence interventions, as well as investigate best methods to implement these solutions.

AzPHA Report: Firearm Violence in Arizona: Data to Support Prevention Policies

The Surgeon General’s Advisory called for a collective commitment of the nation to open our eyes to the problem, demand evidence-based interventions, and implement regulations that work to mitigate the problem.

In addition, the Surgeon General’s Advisory pushed for a neutral space to talk about the unintended consequences of gun ownership and the need for more research and action on effective strategies. A recent survey of gun owners found high levels of support for gun safety policies

In a week that celebrates the value of public health and highlights important gains in health outcomes, like decreases in tobacco-related diseases, infectious diseases, motor vehicle deaths, infant mortality, and improvements in water and food safety, it is important to recognize future challenges.

Even more importantly, we need effective tools, such as Surgeon General’s advisories based on science, to guide prevention strategies that will improve the health of all Americans.

Dr. Sarah Lindstrom Johnson is an Arizona Public Health Association member and an Associate Professor at Arizona State University whose work focuses on decreasing the consequences of violence for youth.

 Jean Ajamie is an Arizona Public Health Association member and an advisor and advocate for youth health and safety and former deputy associate superintendent for school safety for the state of Arizona.

Burt Feuerstein is an Arizona Public Health Association member and a Professor of Child Health and Neurology at the U of A College of Medicine – Phoenix and Emeritus Professor of Lab Medicine, Neurosurgery, and Pediatrics at Univ of CA San Francisco.

Kennedy Cans Everybody Who Calculates the Federal Poverty Limit: Is his Goal to Set the FPL Artificially Low Next Year to Kick People Off Safety Net Programs?

Eligibility for federal safety net programs like Medicaid, SNAP, WIC, and Kids Care requires that applicants establish that they financially qualify.

In order to do the means-testing we need to be able to compare a family’s income to a benchmark to make sure they really need and qualify for a benefit like Medicaid, SNAP or WIC. That benchmark is called the ‘federal poverty level’ (FPL).

For several decades, the federal government has had a small crew of objective and apolitical statisticians who specialize in using economic data to set up the FPL.

The team takes Census Bureau poverty-line figures, adjusts them for inflation, and creates the FPL for the country each year (Alaska and Hawaii have a different FPL than the rest of the US).

This week Secretary Kennedy fired all the staff who do the rigorous and unbiased calculation of the FPL this week. Well, actually, he put them on administrative leave until June 1, at which point they’ll all be canned.

Trump HHS Eliminates Office That Sets Poverty Levels Tied to Benefits for at Least 80 Million People – KFF Health News

HHS will still need to develop an FPL annually – but they’ll no longer have the staff to do it.

Perhaps one of the DOGE bros will take a few minutes and make one up from now on.

There’s a good chance that the mass firing was done so Kennedy/Musk can set their own (arbitrarily low) FPL next year to kick millions of people off safety net programs like Medicaid, SNAP, WIC, and marketplace cost sharing subsidies.

Time will tell – but these guys are good at finding where the hinge points are so they can cause as much damage as possible with the least possible effort.

Arizona Justice Reinvestment Grant: Does Your Organization Want to Apply?

If your organization supports people affected by substance use or the justice system, you may qualify for a new grant opportunity known as the Arizona Justice Reinvestment Grant. As part of Proposition 207 (Smart and Safe Act aka retail marijuana) Arizona funds organizations that help these communities and persons who were victims of overcharging for marijuana possession by county prosecutors.

This grant is designed for organizations working on:

  • Substance use prevention, treatment, and early intervention
  • Reentry, diversion, rehabilitation, and job training for individuals affected by the justice system
  • Addressing factors that contribute to crime and supporting community safety initiatives
  • Restoring civil rights and clearing charges from records (also known as expungement)

Justice Reinvestment Grant Information Session 4/17/25 9-11am

Justice Reinvestment Information Session 4/24/25 9-11am

New Fiscal Analysis: The Economic Impact of Federal Medicaid Cuts in Arizona

Rounds Consulting and the Arizona Chamber Foundation published a new report last week analyzing and highlighting the economic impact in Arizona if the Congress and the President follow through with their threat to make states pay more of the share of Medicaid costs for the ‘childless adult’ population from 90% to 65%.

ARIZONA POLICY BRIEF: Federal Medicaid Cuts & Arizona’s Economy

Arizona is in a particularly vulnerable position as we’re a “trigger statute” under the Affordable Care Act, meaning if the feds drop their contribution for childless adult coverage below 80% the fees the hospitals pay AHCCCS to pay the state portion for Medicaid coverage for childless adults goes away – and Medicaid coverage for more than 550,000 adults would evaporate.

The report focuses on the economic realities of losing that coverage rather than the public health impact – and the results are profound.

Here’s a summary of the potential impacts:

  • Funding Loss: A decrease in the enhanced FMAP rates would lead to a $1.9 billion funding loss for the state, which could double the financial strain that Arizona already faces due to changes in Medicaid funding.
  • Medicaid Expansion Discontinuation: If Arizona were to completely end Medicaid coverage for the expansion population, it would result in a significant $7.5 billion reduction in Medicaid spending.
  • Impact on Healthcare Providers: As healthcare providers try to compensate for these funding losses, they may shift some of the costs onto private insurers. This would drive up insurance premiums for both businesses and individuals.
  • Challenges for Small Businesses: Since many Arizona businesses are small, the rising premiums could push employers to cut back or drop their insurance offerings, creating a cascade of negative economic effects.
  • More uninsured individuals will lose access to healthcare coverage.
  • Higher uncompensated care costs, as uninsured individuals may still seek medical care, but providers won’t be reimbursed.
  • Financial strain on hospitals, which may face more unpaid bills.
  • Increased private insurance premiums, further escalating the cost for businesses and individuals.

The economic consequences are severe, with the potential to lose over 36,000 jobs, a contraction of $3.7 billion in economic activity, and a $138 million drop in state tax revenues.

From the Report:

All Arizonans, regardless of their insurance status, would feel the effects of overcrowded emergency rooms, healthcare facility closures, longer wait times for care, fewer medical professionals, a rise in uninsured populations, and increasing health insurance premiums for individuals and employers.

These policy decisions carry significant economic and social consequences. Cuts to Medicaid could destabilize Arizona’s healthcare industry, increase the burden on emergency services, and reduce the overall quality of care for residents.

The healthcare sector, a $38 billion contributor to Arizona’s economy, would suffer greatly, with rural areas facing the most risk due to higher dependence on Medicaid reimbursements. This complex issue could result in long-term damage to both public health and the state’s financial stability.

Perhaps this excerpt from the report says it best:

The primary conclusion from this research is that the economic consequences of federal spending reductions at the scale that are being considered will be significant.

For context, the economic impact on the state of Arizona will fall somewhere between a significant recession and the Great Recession that caused massive fiscal trauma for multiple years.

ARIZONA POLICY BRIEF: Federal Medicaid Cuts & Arizona’s Economy

AzCareCheck 2.0

AZ CareCheck is Arizona’s public online portal that provides comprehensive information about licensed healthcare facilities, including nursing homes, assisted living centers, hospitals, childcare, and behavioral healthcare services.

ADHS – Public Health Licensing – AZ CareCheck

Established in 2010, the platform offers users access to inspection reports, complaint investigations, enforcement actions, and facility details such as names, addresses, and contact information at a host of facilities that ADHS licenses like skilled nursing and assisted living facilities, behavioral health facilities, hospitals, outpatient treatment clinics, community health centers and even childcare facilities.

Sadly, there was very little if any investment in improving the performance of AZ CareCheck during the Ducey era – and many people became frustrated that the system increasingly became difficult to navigate and had missing, misleading & poor and outdated data.

Governor Hobbs recognized the problem and was able to get a line item in the ADHS budget a couple years ago for ADHS to hire a contractor to update the way the system works and to improve the system’s data quality and useability.

ADHS – Public Health Licensing – AZ Care Check

The new AZ Care Check system went live a couple of weeks ago – and by most accounts users say it’s better and easier to use – and appears to have more complete data now.

If you tried it and gave up before, you might try it again now. You can search for licensing history, which may include deficiencies and/or enforcement actions found against facilities/providers. 

Records can be searched by facility/provider name, address, license type/subtype, and licensing status using the search bar and filters.

I’m not claiming AZ CareCheck is perfect – but it’s better than it was during the Ducey/Christ/Herrington era.

Give it a try at: ADHS – Public Health Licensing – AZ Care Check

AG Mayes Files Lawsuit Challenging Kennedy’s $190M+ in Cuts to Arizona Public Health

Last week HHS Secretary Kennedy terminated more than $190 million in multi-year federal grants that were designed to fill holes we found in Arizona’s public health system during the pandemic.

This abrupt and possibly illegal decision has left state and county health departments, along with their contractors, scrambling to address the immediate and long-term impacts on public health services.​

See last week’s blog post to get a flavor for the scale and magnitude of the irresponsible and even dangerous cuts: Kennedy Cuts $190M in Federal Public Health Grants to Arizona – AZ Public Health Association

A significant portion of the funding affected comes from multi-year grants provided by CDC which were all designed to strengthen Arizona’s public health infrastructure in areas in areas identified as weak or vulnerable during the pandemic.

Those improvements were focused on disease surveillance, response capabilities, and health disparities. The sudden loss of these funds means that critical projects aimed at monitoring and responding to health threats are now at a standstill, leaving gaps that could have serious repercussions in future health emergencies and dozens of now half completed projects.

In addition to the CDC grants Kennedy also targeted AHCCCS. Those reductions stem from cuts by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which plays a pivotal role in funding behavioral health services.

The loss of SAMHSA funds jeopardizes services that many Arizonans rely on for mental health and substance use disorder treatment, potentially leaving thousands without essential care.

Read more about the SAMHSA cuts here: AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes says federal grant cuts are illegal

Fortunately, we have an Attorney General who is vigilant, recognizes the danger to Arizona’s public health system that the cuts pose – and who also believes that the contract cuts were illegal.

Last week she joined a coalition of attorneys general in suing Kennedy, arguing that the abrupt termination of these grants violates federal law and harms public health nationwide. The lawsuit looks to restore funding and prevent further disruptions to essential health services.

See ADHS’ Complaint Challenging Kennedy’s AZ Public Health System Cuts

See AHCCCS’ Complaint Challenging Kennedy’s Behavioral Health Cuts

Update: A ruling April 3 by U.S. District Judge Mary S. McElroy in Rhode Island bars the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and its agencies from implementing the cuts while case moves forward.

Boost Your Career Potential with an Affordable Online Degree

If you’re an Arizona Public Health Association member, employee, or the spouse or legal dependent of a member or an employee, you can take advantage of several education benefits thanks to an alliance with University of Maryland Global Campus, a leader in online education for working adults. Save up to 25 percent on out-of-state tuition for most UMGC programs and get your $50 application fee waived when you apply as a new student.

Arizona Public Health Association Alliance | UMGC

As an AZPHA member you qualify for a discount will be applied to out-of-state tuition for eligible students in most programs. Discounted tuition rates may not fall below the standard in-state rate or any special tuition rate offered to eligible active-duty military servicemembers, their spouses, or dependents.

You can learn more by clicking here: Arizona Public Health Association Alliance | UMGC