Celebrating Excellence in Public Health: AzPHA’s 2025 Awards Gala

Last Thursday we hosted our annual Public Health Awards at the vibrant 435 Collective in downtown Phoenix. The event was a resounding success, drawing over 90 members and guests who gathered to honor the exceptional individuals and organizations advancing public health across Arizona.

Those of you that do similar events for your organizations should consider the facility for your events – the service and facility were terrific and it was affordable.

A huge thank you goes to Dr. DeShawn Taylor, AzPHA’s Board Vice President, whose dedication and tireless efforts were instrumental in bringing this event to life. Her leadership ensured a seamless and memorable evening for all attendees.

We also thank our board members who attended in full force, demonstrating their unwavering support for the association and its mission.

The night was a testament to the remarkable work being done in public health, with each awardee exemplifying excellence and commitment to improving the well-being of Arizonans. The 2025 award recipients are:

  • Policy Maker of the Year: Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes
  • Senator Andy Nichols Honor Award: Karen Woodhouse (ADE, Eyes on Learning)
  • Pete Wertheim Public Health Leadership Award: Barbara Lang (Cochise County Health & Social Services) and Jeanne Nizigiyimana (Valleywise Health Center for Refugee and Global Health)
  • Alida Montiel Indigenous Health & Advocacy Award: Frances Villescaz (Gila River Health Care, AIHEC)
  • Rising Public Health Champion Award: Jeffrey Hanna (Zeihan ProHealth)
  • Public Health Research Award: Dr. Megan Jehn (Arizona State University, SORT) and Dr. Kristen Pogreba Brown (University of Arizona, SAFER)

These honorees were celebrated for their innovative approaches, dedication, and significant contributions to public health. Their work continues to inspire and drive positive change in communities throughout Arizona.

The evening was not only a celebration of achievements but also a reminder of the collective effort required to advance public health. As we reflect on this successful event, we look forward to continuing our mission to improve the health and well-being of all Arizonans.

Newly Formed Governors Public Health Alliance Aims to Protect Science-Based Health Policies: Arizona Should Join

This week, 15 governors from across the country came together to form the Governors Public Health Alliance  — a new partnership focused on keeping public health decisions based on facts, data, and science.

The Alliance was created in direct response to the lack of clear, evidence-based and scientifically sound leadership, guidance and decisions coming out of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services these days.

The Alliance has four initial main goals:

  • Public health guidance – Governors and health experts will align policies, like vaccine recommendations, across member states so people and providers get clear and consistent evidence-based information.
  • Health threat detection – Member states will share information quickly about new diseases or health risks, bypassing CDC.
  • Emergency preparedness – States will work together to plan for and respond to public health emergencies.
  • Global health liaison – Connect with international health organizations to stay informed about worldwide health issues.

The group includes both Democratic and Republican governors, as well as a team of public health experts who will advise their work. Their mission statement says they want to make sure public health decisions are “driven by data, facts, and the health of the American people” — not politics, as is largely the case right now with the HHS agencies.

Arizona isn’t a founding member but there’s still time to join, and we urge Governor Hobbs to do so.

You can learn more about the Alliance soon at www.govsforhealth.org

Supreme Court Spotlight Decision: Braidwood v Becerra (aka Kennedy v Braidwood)

In Kennedy v. Braidwood Management (the Supreme Court’s resolution of Braidwood v. Becerra), the Court held 6-3 that members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force are “inferior officers” whose appointment by the HHS Secretary is consistent with the Appointments Clause.

As a result, the ACA’s requirement that private health plans (and Medicaid expansion plans) cover Task Force–recommended preventive services without cost sharing survived the challenge, essentially upholding the current system linking health insurance coverage to the Task Force recommendations.

The plaintiffs (Braidwood) wanted to eliminate all of the Task Force recommendations developed since 2010 (when the ACA was signed). 

Note: The Task Force recommendations that were in place when President Obama signed the ACA remain hard wired and can’t be eliminated by new Task Force recommendations.

A and B Recommendations | United States Preventive Services Taskforce

The post ACA implementation recommendations that Braidwood wanted to get rid of include:

  • Colorectal cancer screenings for adults ages 45–49
  • Depression screenings for adolescents
  • HIV prevention medications, including PrEP

This outcome is an important short-term victory for preventive health, ensuring that millions of Americans continue to have access to evidence-based care that saves lives and reduces long-term health costs.

I say short-term because the Court also said Kennedy has the authority to remove USPSTF members at will. As he did with the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Kennedy is likely to replace Task Force members with his friends in the alt-science community. That new task force could nix the recommendations made by the TF since 2010..

See the ruling: Kennedy v Braidwood

For now, these protections stand, and health plans still need to cover US Preventative Health Services Task Force category A & B recommendations –  but Kennedy can fire the task force at will and replace them with whoever he sees fit (without senate confirmation) and could direct them to target and eliminate the recommendations that have been put in place since 2010 – gradually (or even quickly) eroding access to critical preventive services.

Read more from ASTHO’s Public Health Litigation Round-Up and AzPHA’s background post here.

Related: U.S. Supreme Court Could Roll Back, Freeze or Eliminate Preventive Health Coverage – Oral Arguments Tomorrow (4/21/25) – AZ Public Health Association

New Threat to Public Health: Preventive Care on the Chopping Block – AZ Public Health Association

2025 Supreme Court Decisions: A Mixed Bag for Public Health

One of the most important parts of the U.S. Constitution is its system of checks and balances. This system makes sure that no one branch of government—Congress, the President, or the Supreme Court—has too much power.

The Supreme Court plays a critical role by interpreting the law and protecting people’s rights, especially when politics get extreme (like now). In times like these, when big public health challenges are hitting the nation (some of the challenges self-imposed by Secretary Kennedy and the president)… an independent US Supreme Court plays an even more important role than usual.

Did the Court exercise that independence from the executive branch this session? The answer is yes and no. This year’s decisions were a mixed bag for public health.

Some hoped SCOTUS would bring clarity and a cool head. Instead, it delivered a mix of confusing and sometimes conflicting rulings.

The Court said states can block minors with gender dysphoria from getting doctor-prescribed treatments. It also weakened workplace diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and stopped patients from suing states that refuse to work with health providers who also perform abortions.

Rural hospitals also lost their case for better Medicare payments to cover care for low-income patients.

Still, it wasn’t all bad. In Kennedy v. Braidwood, the Court upheld the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [more on this in the next blog] keeping (for now) key preventive services like colorectal cancer screenings for adults 45–49, depression screenings for teens, and HIV prevention medications like PrEP. But as we’ll see in the next blog – that relief is likely temporary as Kennedy still has plenty of time to dismantle the Task Force.

The Court also backed federal powers to regulate vaping products that attract kids and “ghost guns” that can’t be traced. And it made it easier for people to challenge federal benefit denials and for students with disabilities to seek protection.

Big thanks to AzPHA member James Hodge, JD, for breaking down these important cases in his article in the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. Read more here.

Arizona Needs to Submit a Rural Health Transformation Plan in 3 Weeks: What’s the Plan?

The clock is ticking for Arizona to submit a plan to use money from the new Rural Health Transformation Program that was created by Congress to blunt the political fallout from cuts to Medicaid enacted under HR1.

When HR1 was signed into law on July 4, 2025, it extended big tax breaks for high income households and corporations while reducing federal funding for Medicaid, SNAP, and other core public health programs.

Those cuts (especially to Medicaid) will eventually have long-term bad impacts on rural hospitals (urban hospitals are less exposed because they have less exposure to Medicaid and a more diverse payer mix).

In the coming years, the HR1 cuts will weaken rural hospital finances. Some will cut or end services like labor and delivery. Others will be forced to close altogether.

To offset those coming effects (or I would argue to provide political cover) Congress set up the Rural Health Transformation Program. The program gives $10B per year for five years across the US (FY 2026–2030). Arizona’s share is $100M per year (for 5 years).

The plans are due soon – on November 5

Governor Hobbs has tasked the Governor’s Office (rather than AHCCCS or ADHS) to develop Arizona’s plan.

CMS released the Notice of Funding Opportunity on September 15  and state plans are due November 5, 2025 — less than three weeks from now. CMS is supposed to approve or deny each proposal by December 31, 2025.

Note: States are prohibited from using RHTP dollars to finance the non-federal share of Medicaid expenditures, and administrative costs can’t exceed 10% of the total state allocation. Annual expenditure reports will be required each federal fiscal year (October 1–September 30).

To support Arizona stakeholders, the UA Center for Rural Health made a Rural Health Transformation Program Toolkit. The site includes a Policy Brief that outlines the program’s structure, funding restrictions, and key considerations for shaping Arizona’s proposal.

See the UA Center for Rural Health 2-Page Policy Brief

With the plan due in less than a month, now is the time for rural health leaders, hospital administrators, and community advocates to review the materials and provide input to the Governor’s Office.

I believe the point person for the Plan in the Gov’s Office is Meaghan Kramer… so that appears to be the person to contact to try to influence how AZ plans to allocate the funds.

 

Arizona Public Health Association Announces 2025 Public Health Awards

Phoenix, AZ (Oct 15., 2025) — The Arizona Public Health Association (AzPHA) is celebrating the 2025 Public Health Awards on Thursday, October 23, at the vibrant 435 Collective in downtown Phoenix. The annual event recognizes outstanding public health professionals, advocates, and policymakers performing extraordinary services in communities across Arizona.

This year’s honorees represent a diverse and impactful group of leaders:

  • Public Health Research Award: Dr. Megan Jehn (Arizona State University, SORT) and Dr. Kristen Pogreba Brown (University of Arizona, SAFER)
  • Pete Wertheim Public Health Leadership Award: Barbara Lang (Cochise County Health & Social Services) and Jeanne Nizigiyimana (Valleywise Health Center for Refugee and Global Health)
  • Alida Montiel Indigenous Health & Advocacy Award: Frances Villescaz (Gila River Health Care, AIHEC)
  • Rising Public Health Champion Award: Jeffery Hanna (Zeihan ProHealth)
  • Senator Andy Nichols Award: Karen Woodhouse (ADE, Eyes on Learning)
  • Policy Maker of the Year: Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes

“These awards are more than recognition—they’re a reflection of the deep commitment and innovation happening across Arizona’s public health landscape,” said Will Humble, MPH, Executive Director of AzPHA. “From rural counties to urban centers, our honorees are tackling complex health challenges with compassion, evidence-based strategies, and a relentless drive to improve lives. Their work inspires all of us to keep pushing for a healthier, more equitable Arizona.”

The evening will bring together public health professionals, community leaders, and advocates for a night of celebration, networking, and reflection on the legacy of public health in Arizona—dating back to AzPHA’s founding in 1928.

Tickets are on sale now for $45 and include access to the awards ceremony, networking reception, and light refreshments. Space is limited—reserve your spot today at https://azpha.wildapricot.org/event-6235564

About the Arizona Public Health Association

Founded in 1928, the Arizona Public Health Association (AzPHA) is a nonprofit membership organization dedicated to improving the health and well-being of all Arizonans. AzPHA brings together public health professionals, students, advocates, and community members to advance sound public health policy, promote health equity, and strengthen the public health workforce. Through education, advocacy, and collaboration, AzPHA works to ensure that every community in Arizona has the opportunity to thrive. For more information, visit azpha.org.

Telehealth Ends for Most Medicare Members

Telehealth has been an efficient way to provide certain kinds of health care services for many people on Medicare – providing easier access to healthcare for patients and better use of time for providers ever since the pandemic.

That’s now changed, and Medicare has largely ended telehealth in certain areas, with new geographic restrictions that affect how and where (and sometimes whether) Medicare members get their care via telehealth.

The expansion of telehealth during the pandemic showed remarkable improvements in access to care as documented in a Kaiser Family Foundation report. Before the pandemic, Medicare’s telehealth coverage was limited. Only patients in rural areas or specific settings had access, and visits had to be conducted via real-time audiovisual technology.

The public health emergency lifted those barriers, letting Medicare members use telehealth for a broad range of services, including behavioral health, chronic disease management, and primary care visits. 

A study published in Health Affairs highlighted how these changes improved care access for members who had struggled to see their doctors regularly. Older adults, those living in rural & underserved areas, and patients managing multiple chronic conditions helped the most.

Geographic Restrictions & Behavioral Health Services

On October 1 the geographic and other limitations on Medicare telehealth came back. Telehealth services (for Medicare members) are now limited to rural areas unless members receive specific services, like monthly visits for home dialysis or certain mental health treatments.

This means that telehealth services will generally be limited to rural areas, and patients will need to receive services at specific originating sites, such as medical facilities, rather than from their homes.

Medicare Telehealth Flexibilities and CMS Operations During Government Shutdown – ASCO

Note: there are still some exceptions to the geography rules for behavioral and mental health services. These services can still be provided via telehealth to Medicare beneficiaries in both rural and urban areas and patients can receive these services in their homes 

Traditional Medicare will still cover telehealth services for some mental and behavioral health care, some substance use disorder treatment, end stage kidney disease assessments and emergency stroke care even in urban areas.

Traditional Medicare will no longer cover telehealth services for routine primary care visits, chronic disease management (e.g. diabetes care, heart disease, arthritis etc.), or follow up visits.

So, if you’re a traditional Medicare member in the Phoenix or Tucson metro areas and require telehealth for general care, chronic disease management, specialist consultations or most follow-up services, you’ll likely need to visit a healthcare facility in person now. Don’t blame your doctor, their staff or your health insurance. You can blame congress and the president. 

Medicare Advantage Plans May Offer More Flexibility

Medicare Advantage plans sometimes offer more flexibility when it comes to telehealth. These private plans sometimes have broader coverage options and may not be as restricted by geographic limitations. If you’re enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan, check with your plan provider to understand the specific telehealth benefits and flexibility.

What Could Have Been

It didn’t have to be this way. The bipartisan CONNECT for Health Act offered a comprehensive and efficient solution. This bill proposed permanent expansions of telehealth in Medicare (including the removal of geographic site requirements that restrict telehealth to rural areas) and drops in-person visit rules for behavioral health.

Importantly, it also included measures to reduce potential fraud and abuse, something sorely needed to prevent fraud and make telehealth services sustainable over time. Those measures include setting stricter guidelines for billing and ensuring better auditing of services.

The CONNECT Act also addresses concerns about overuse of telehealth by focusing on finding high-value services that are proper for virtual care.

Sadly, it appears that Congress will wait until they hear from mad constituents before they take up the CONNECT Act – or when Congress finally makes a budget deal, maybe they’ll extend the added telehealth flexibility that proved so useful during the pandemic.

France: Their Public Health & Health Care Systems

From Croatia, our travels take us to France, famous for their food, wine, culture and health care system. France often ranks among the healthiest places in the world. I’ll take a crack at explaining why.

Health Care: Universal Insurance with Personal Freedom

France’s health care system is built on national health insurance. Everyone is covered, with funding coming from payroll and general taxes. Patients can choose their own doctors, and fees are regulated to keep care affordable. Most people buy supplemental coverage (mutuelles) to cover co-pays, but the baseline system guarantees care for all.

Hospitals are a mix of public and private, all working under national price controls and quality standards. Unlike the U.S., there’s nobody uninsured.

Public Health Framework

The Ministry of Health provides national policy leadership, while the Agences Régionales de Santé run programs locally. This ensures that immunization campaigns, infectious disease surveillance, and hospital inspections are standardized but responsive to local needs, much like in the US. Santé publique France, the national public health institute, tracks health outcomes, runs surveillance systems, and offers scientific guidance.

Oversight of Facilities

Hospitals, nursing homes, and child care facilities are licensed and regularly inspected by the regional Agences Régionales de Santé using national standards. These inspections cover hygiene, staffing, patient safety, and quality of care. Child care facilities also fall under the Ministry of Education, but health and safety oversight is coordinated through regional Agences Régionales de Santé ARS inspectors.

Food Safety and Restaurant Oversight

France has rigorous food safety rules shaped heavily by the EU. The Ministry of Agriculture and Food Sovereignty manages national policy, while local health authorities inspect restaurants, markets, and producers.

EU rules limit additives, require detailed labeling, and ensure traceability from farm to fork. Restaurant inspections check for hygiene, safe storage, and compliance with these EU standards.

Emergency Services

France’s emergency medical service is unique: ambulances are staffed with physicians or advanced nurses, not EMTs and paramedics like here.

This means hospital-level care often begins at the patient’s doorstep. Epidemiology and outbreak response are centralized through Santé publique France, with regional ARS coordinating local action.

Clinical Workforce

Like in the US, France also suffers from a shortage of physicians. Until 2020, acceptance to France’s medical schools was regulated by the “numerus closus” which set strict limits on how many students could enter the schools annually.

While the annual acceptance number was supposed to account for population growth, the process was highly influenced by the Ordre des Médecins, France’s powerful physicians accreditation board (like the AMA kinda), which wanted to keep access to the profession exclusive.

The 2020 pandemic brought to light the severe shortage of physicians and the numerus closus were eliminated. Today, each medical school works collaboratively with their Agence Régionales de Santé to set their own admission limits, which considers regional population growth and medical desert.

Training physicians takes time and the first cohort of non-numerus closus physicians won’t be ready to practice until 2029 at the earliest  (9 years post highschool). France has been working to create a new level of nurses, similar to the US Nurse Practitioner model, which has been receiving lots of resistance from the Ordre des Médecins.

Nutrition, Physical Activity and Urban Planning

France is designed for walking, even here in Paris. Cities have dense cores with wide sidewalks, bike lanes, and pedestrian-only areas. Public transport systems are robust, reducing reliance on cars. Cycling is encouraged through dedicated bike infrastructure, and Paris in particular has expanded bike lanes dramatically in recent years.

The result is purposeful physical activity, walking to the store, biking to work, and using stairs instead of cars. Walking is a normal part of daily life, one of the reasons why they have way lower obesity rates compared with the U.S.

Farmers Markets are an integral part of a city’s urban planning and French’s way of life. Visit any town in France and you will see a “Place du Marché” where open-air farmers markets still take place to this day (beware of where you park your car the eve of a market-day!). Farmers Markets (open-air or covered) are part of Parisian’s weekly (and in some cases, daily) activities. There is a farmers’ market every day of the week and the Ville de Paris maintains a calendar of events.

There, Parisians access fresh and locally sourced produce, meats and fish that support a healthy diet. Farmers’ markets also support a strong local economy; with the high fixed costs of brick and mortar stores (and uncertainty around folks passing by your location to purchase your goods), many small businesses choose the itinerant modalities of the farmers market and bring their goods directly to their customers around the city.

Mental Health and Substance Use

Mental health services are fully integrated into the national system. Psychiatric hospitals and clinics provide inpatient and outpatient care, while community-based mental health centers are expanding. Treatment for serious mental illness is covered under insurance, ensuring access regardless of income.

Substance abuse services like alcohol and opioid treatment are provided through hospitals and specialized clinics, often with strong links to social services. France has pioneered harm reduction policies, including safe injection sites in major cities.

Alcohol Consumption and Health

Alcohol plays a large cultural role in France, especially wine, but binge drinking is rare even though the drinking age is 18 rather than 21. Per capita consumption is higher than in the U.S., though it has declined in recent decades due to public health campaigns and taxation policies, although I have to say a nice bottle of Burgundy is only like 10 euro.

Reproductive Health

Shortly after the US Supreme Court Dobbs decision, France’s Assemblé National (legislative body) was swift in identifying the need to guarantee women access to their full suite of health care and reproductive health services. The agreement was widely accepted across all political parties (a rarity) and France started the process to amend their constitution.

On March 8, 2024, the following statement was included in Article 34 of the Constitution “ The law determines the conditions under which Women have the guaranteed freedom to access a “Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy” and France became the first country in the world to guarantee access to abortion services in their constitution.

The Role of the European Union

EU membership shapes much of France’s public health policy. Food ingredient rules are stricter than in the U.S., banning many additives and requiring clear labeling. EU environmental and occupational health directives influence air quality standards and workplace safety. The EU also coordinates cross-border infectious disease surveillance, ensuring France has early warning for outbreaks.

Localities can’t set their own health policies like restricting universal access to care, changing to rules around immunizations requirement to start school or altering a pandemic response set by the central government

Health Outcomes Compared to the U.S.

● Obesity: 17% of adults, compared to over 40% in the U.S.

● Smoking: Higher than the U.S. but declining due to tobacco control.

● Alcohol: Higher than the U.S. but falling steadily.

● Life Expectancy: Around 82 years, several years higher than in the U.S.

Supplemental Material:  Differential Diagnoses | A comparative History of Health Care Problems and Solutions in the United States and France by Paul V. Dutton (brief book review here). Differential Diagnoses: A Comparative History of Health Care Problems and Solutions in the United States and France (The Culture and Politics of Health Care Work): 9780801445125: Medicine & Health Science Books @ Amazon.com